To Paradise

To Paradise

  • Downloads:6350
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-12-16 00:51:13
  • Update Date:2025-09-08
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Hanya Yanagihara
  • ISBN:1529077478
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

From the author of the classic A Little Life, a bold, brilliant novel spanning three centuries and three different versions of the American experiment, about lovers, family, loss and the elusive promise of utopia。

In an alternate version of 1893 America, New York is part of the Free States, where people may live and love whomever they please (or so it seems)。 The fragile young scion of a distinguished family resists betrothal to a worthy suitor, drawn to a charming music teacher of no means。 In a 1993 Manhattan besieged by the AIDS epidemic, a young Hawaiian man lives with his much older, wealthier partner, hiding his troubled childhood and the fate of his father。 And in 2093, in a world riven by plagues and governed by totalitarian rule, a powerful scientist’s damaged granddaughter tries to navigate life without him—and solve the mystery of her husband’s disappearances。

These three sections are joined in an enthralling and ingenious symphony, as recurring notes and themes deepen and enrich one another: A townhouse in Washington Square Park in Greenwich Village; illness, and treatments that come at a terrible cost; wealth and squalor; the weak and the strong; race; the definition of family, and of nationhood; the dangerous righteousness of the powerful, and of revolutionaries; the longing to find a place in an earthly paradise, and the gradual realization that it can’t exist。 What unites not just the characters, but these Americas, are their reckonings with the qualities that make us human: Fear。 Love。 Shame。 Need。 Loneliness。

To Paradise is a fin de siècle novel of marvellous literary effect, but above all it is a work of emotional genius。 The great power of this remarkable novel is driven by Yanagihara’s understanding of the aching desire to protect those we love – partners, lovers, children, friends, family and even our fellow citizens – and the pain that ensues when we cannot。

Download

Reviews

mylogicisfuzzy

One of the most anticipated novels of 2022 and one that, I think, might divide opinions just as Yanagihara’s previous hit, A Little Life did。 I should confess to not having read A Little Life, at the time of publication, it sounded intriguing, but I’d had a long ‘to read’ pile and didn’t want to add another long novel to it。 To Paradise, then。 The novel is structured around people with same names living, at some point of their lives, in the same house in New York’s Washington Square a hundred ye One of the most anticipated novels of 2022 and one that, I think, might divide opinions just as Yanagihara’s previous hit, A Little Life did。 I should confess to not having read A Little Life, at the time of publication, it sounded intriguing, but I’d had a long ‘to read’ pile and didn’t want to add another long novel to it。 To Paradise, then。 The novel is structured around people with same names living, at some point of their lives, in the same house in New York’s Washington Square a hundred years apart: 1893, 1993 and 2093。 Their New Yorks and Americas are quite different in some ways, same in others。 This structure is what first attracted me to the novel, in interviews, Yanagihara said she wanted to explore different paths America could have taken。 So, in 1893, David Bingham is a 28-year-old scion of one of founding families of the Free States where white people can love and marry who they like (black people are helped to cross from the segregated Southern states and then encouraged to move on to the West or Canada)。 David is at a crossroads, deciding whether to marry the older, stable, unimaginative Charles Griffith or dashing, penniless piano teacher Edward Bishop。 Prone to long bouts of depression, he has led a secluded life controlled by his grandfather and this relationship between grandparents and grandchildren is a major theme of the novel。 The first part reminded me of both Wharton and Henry James and I rather liked that。In the second part, we move to 1993 and the unnamed but very much present AIDS epidemic where a young Hawaiian David lives with his much older lover Charles and reminisces about growing up with his grandmother。 His father, also David carries on the narrative, writing from the hospital bed he has been confined to for some years。 He reminisces of the time in his life he was involved with a different Edward Bishop, a man with revolutionary ideas to take back Hawaiian independence and dreams of being able to walk again and going to see his son。 I found this part of the novel the weakest, lacking direction and at times, it was a struggle to keep reading if I am being honest。The third part, set in future forms half of the novel。 America is segregated again but this time into zones, ravaged by the climate change and frequent deadly pandemics。 Charlie Bingham is a laboratory technician who misses her grandfather and wanders what her husband does on his weekly free nights。 Her life is very different and basic – work, home, sleep, eat and it is apparent that in this bleak, dystopian version of America, most freedoms have been sacrificed to ensure basic survival。 How this came about is slowly revealed in emails and letters written by Charlie’s grandfather Charles to his closest friend in Britain。 Charles was an epidemiologist and involved in some of the decisions that led to the current state of things, and I found his narrative by far the most interesting and the best part of the whole novel。 As we live in pandemic times, it is also the part of the novel that will surely resonate with most readers。 Apart from grandparent-grandchild relationships already mentioned, Yanagihara explores themes of love in its many forms, loneliness, feelings of inadequacy and not belonging, freedom, heritage and privilege。 Her characters have the same names, but they are not the same people or even related。 In another interview, I’d read that Binghams and Griffiths were some of the missionaries who came to Yanagihara’s native Hawaii and I thought it interesting how she used these names for foundation characters in her versions of what America could have been and what it could become。 At times, I loved her writing, in the first part I thought how wonderful, a modern Wharton-esque style。 I found the third part more and more affecting as the novel neared its end。 I liked the ways in which she connected the three parts, the first narrative is re-told as a story in part three, a speech from part two makes its way into one of Charles’s emails。 At the same time, I also found the book quite uneven。 The first part was enjoyable but also somewhat slight, the second part I already mentioned being a struggle while the third part was at times unnecessarily slow – but it did eventually win me over。 At around 720 pages, this is a long novel and I thought the different versions of America Yanagihara imagined could have been explored more, especially in the first two parts (the second part didn’t seem particularly different) or from a different perspective。 All of Yanagihara’s characters are from privileged backgrounds to some extent and it would have been interesting to hear from someone else, Charlie’s husband in the third part for example。 Three and a half stars which I’m rounding up to four for the ending。 My thanks to Pan Macmillan, Picador and Netgalley for the opportunity to read To Paradise。 。。。more

Violet Daniels

What a whirlwind of a book。 I have a lot to say but ill keep it short & sweet。 This book disappointed me and caused a slight reading slump。 I feel like it's too ambitious and causes confusion。 There's a lot to keep track of and I felt very lost reading this。 It falls short of being a masterpiece but it could be, if it were more concise。 That being said, there was so much i liked about it。 The characters, the world building, the messages about our own world and society。 More uplifting than 'A lit What a whirlwind of a book。 I have a lot to say but ill keep it short & sweet。 This book disappointed me and caused a slight reading slump。 I feel like it's too ambitious and causes confusion。 There's a lot to keep track of and I felt very lost reading this。 It falls short of being a masterpiece but it could be, if it were more concise。 That being said, there was so much i liked about it。 The characters, the world building, the messages about our own world and society。 More uplifting than 'A little life' for sure (but that is not hard) 。。。more

niri

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Tracey McHardy

I have prevaricated about writing this review。 Partly this is due to knowing it's by the author of A Little Life which is one of my favourite books and which I obsessed about in a rare way。 It took over my life for two weeks。I have been mulling over how I feel about this book。The plot that I discuss here is more or less that outlined in the "blurb" so i don't think there are many spoilers in this reviewThe first section is mainly about David who is a member of a rich family in an alternate Ameri I have prevaricated about writing this review。 Partly this is due to knowing it's by the author of A Little Life which is one of my favourite books and which I obsessed about in a rare way。 It took over my life for two weeks。I have been mulling over how I feel about this book。The plot that I discuss here is more or less that outlined in the "blurb" so i don't think there are many spoilers in this reviewThe first section is mainly about David who is a member of a rich family in an alternate America in 1893。 In the Free States people may live and love how they please seemingly。 David has had illnesses in the past and his Grandfather wants him to marry a man who will care for him, but David falls in love with a penniless musician。 He wants a life "in colour"。 Yanagihara explores themes of freedom and choice and how love and hate is a spectrum。 She isn't afraid of looking at the dark recesses of the human personality and how we justify our motivations to ourselves and others。 David is not always a character you warm to。The 2nd section is set in a Manhattan in 1993 during the Aids epidemic。 A young Hawaiian man lives with a wealthy older man to whom he reveals little of his background and identity。 We find out more about this through his father's story。 The theme of exile from your own culture is explored here。The 3rd section is set in 2093 in a totalitarian world in which people's lives are controlled by disease。 A grandfather has the care of his granddaughter who seems to be "damaged" in some way。 He loves her but what is his own background? Yanagihara is like a composer using recurring themes and instruments/notes to link the three parts together。 On a superficial level, names and a house recur。 More profoundly, themes such as wealth and poverty, power and weakness, racial identity, disease/illness resonate。 It asks what is a family? The author says in an address "to the Bookseller" that "。。。 time and progress are not linear but a loop, one that pleats and folds back on itself, the future becoming the past before you know it "The role of science and its responsibilities reminded me of The People in the Trees。 The loving bonds between the grandfather and Charlie reminded me of the unconditional paternal love that Jude receives in A little Life from his tutor, Harold。 However, there are more conditions attached here…There is much in the third part that will be familiar from our own of a pandemic but also much more that is thought provoking and disturbing in many ways。 Like The People in the Tress and Frankenstein it asks difficult questions about science and how this balances with a human's freedoms and rights。 That’s the plot and analysis of the themes but what about the emotional response? I didn't engage with it in the same way that I did with A Little Life。 This was more than just being about a non- linear structure。 Both Davids are hard to empathise with。 Charlie is probably the character that won my heart。 She reminded me a bit of Ishiguro's Klara (no spoilers here about why) Yes it's a powerful and well written book with many important things to say, but I think I may need to let it settle some more or reread it to understand more about it。 It was like eating an expensive tasting menu in a top- class restaurant。 Some flavours were there so subtly and others were not what you were expecting and maybe you thought at the end you were still hungry but you weren’t really。 I need more time to digest this book。 I feel that it's one to process slowly and carefully。Thank you to the publishers and Netgalley for my ARC in exchange for an honest review。 。。。more

Nicky Hallam

I'm still processing this, I'm not sure how to write what I feel in a short review。 It's an epic book, I read it on the kindle but I imagine the physical copy is massive。The story covers a span of hundreds of years in New York。 The portion set in the 2090s is a little dystopia and given our recent experience with pandemics a bit more scary than it would have been if their book was published a few years ago。The 3 sections are all quite different but there are themes running through, not least the I'm still processing this, I'm not sure how to write what I feel in a short review。 It's an epic book, I read it on the kindle but I imagine the physical copy is massive。The story covers a span of hundreds of years in New York。 The portion set in the 2090s is a little dystopia and given our recent experience with pandemics a bit more scary than it would have been if their book was published a few years ago。The 3 sections are all quite different but there are themes running through, not least the use of the same character names。 It's a skill of the writer that even though the names are the same I never confused the characters。It's a book I just want to talk about。 I need someone else to read it so I can discuss the characters, the stories, what might have happened after we left them。 。。。more

Emma

I’m going to start this review by saying that I do not feel qualified to review To Paradise! The scope and scale of the ideas Hanya Yanagihara has depicted in this novel and her storytelling ability, are far beyond my use of the English language。 Yet, I can’t just say ‘it’s f***ing amazing, read it。’ I need to give you more。The book is set in three different time frames – 1893, 1993 and 2093。 The characters differ in each section but what remains the same is the character names, they are all rec I’m going to start this review by saying that I do not feel qualified to review To Paradise! The scope and scale of the ideas Hanya Yanagihara has depicted in this novel and her storytelling ability, are far beyond my use of the English language。 Yet, I can’t just say ‘it’s f***ing amazing, read it。’ I need to give you more。The book is set in three different time frames – 1893, 1993 and 2093。 The characters differ in each section but what remains the same is the character names, they are all recurring。 At first I thought this would confuse the heck out of me, but each character is so vivid and so perfectly drawn that I had no problems。 Themes of love, parenthood, death, friendship run through the book but the principal theme is finding your version of paradise。 And I took great enjoyment discovering the ways that every single character seeks this。To Paradise is a fully immersive reading journey, I couldn’t escape it, even when I wasn’t reading it, I was thinking about it。 It seeped into my soul。 I can’t write this review without mentioning A Little Life, this is a very different book (it didn’t emotionally devastate me as much!) but what is the same is the pull to read it。 As I’ve already said, it’s inescapable。 This will be one I return to and I know I’ll get something new from it every time I do。Compelling, unique and indescribably good, To Paradise is not just a book, it’s an experience 。。。more

Autumn Chuang

Just。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。not。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。very good? A stark disappointment compared to A Little Life。 I did not finish this, neither did Aileen, and I just gave it to Hayley last night。 A lackluster literary hot potato。

Thebooktrail

Discover the locations in To ParadiseWow。 What have I just read。 It’s a heavyweight at 720 pages so thank goodness for the kindle。 I haven’t’ read A Little Life so didn’t know what to expect but I had heard of this author’s powerful imagery and so was keen to read it。The novel is in three parts and each one of these represents a different time。 We start in the 1890s, then move to the 1980s and end up in the future。Through time the author invites us to visit America where NYC is the informal cap Discover the locations in To ParadiseWow。 What have I just read。 It’s a heavyweight at 720 pages so thank goodness for the kindle。 I haven’t’ read A Little Life so didn’t know what to expect but I had heard of this author’s powerful imagery and so was keen to read it。The novel is in three parts and each one of these represents a different time。 We start in the 1890s, then move to the 1980s and end up in the future。Through time the author invites us to visit America where NYC is the informal capital of the the so-called Free States。 Here, women have more rights and gay marriage is allowed, but there are limits as to how many non Europeans can live here。 There’s stories of slaves, those who have escaped from the south and the author invites us to look back and see, observe, feel all the emotions of this time and place。Then we move to the 1980s and see how David and Charles have developed。 There are flashbacks to Hawaii and when it became a state in the 1950s。 This middle part doesn’t move the story on in so much that it examines another life and world view。 The AIDS crisis comes into play here but blink and you’ll miss it。 Not sure if that was how the author intended but it felt cold and empty。 Maybe a reflection of how people at the time felt like HIV and AIDS was treated at the time?By the time we get to 2094, we see a new side to the division that was the norm in the 1890s。 This was like reading a story about the world today and all its problems。 There’s famine, floods, a pandemic and control over citizens is used as a tool by those in ‘power’。 Again we meet David and Charles and how they have come full circle yet in many ways haven’t moved at all。I am left feeling emotional after reading this。 A little empty and confused if I’m honest。 The novel would have been so much more powerful with a good editor。 You can’t deny this author can write, play with emotions, blend truth and reality and tinker with world politics through a finely tuned lens。 The third part of the story was the real novel for me。 A series of observations and thoughts on the state of the world today。 As a whole , it’s ambitious and powerful, but I will remember the third part the most and that for me is the real gem here。 。。。more

Aisling Cahill

I'm going to preface this review by saying that I haven't read A Little Life。 But I know the hype, and I know that a lot of people will go into reading To Paradise expecting something like more of the same。 But you shouldn't。 To Paradise isn't that。 It's something entirely different。I had two very vague ideas about To Paradise before I read it:1: It's long。2: It's split into three parts。I didn't know what to expect aside from that。At first, the book seems quite straightforward。 The first section I'm going to preface this review by saying that I haven't read A Little Life。 But I know the hype, and I know that a lot of people will go into reading To Paradise expecting something like more of the same。 But you shouldn't。 To Paradise isn't that。 It's something entirely different。I had two very vague ideas about To Paradise before I read it:1: It's long。2: It's split into three parts。I didn't know what to expect aside from that。At first, the book seems quite straightforward。 The first section is set in the late 1800s and follows a number of characters that you get to know quite intimately。 I loved this first section and was excited to see where the characters would find themselves in the second section。Admittedly, I was confused for a spell once I hit the section sections。 The characters I had come to know and love were all there, except they weren't。 This section of the story follows characters with the same names as those from the first section, but the very essence of these characters is entirely different。 It's not the same story, it's not the same time in history and it's not the same people。 And again, in the third section, we see characters with the same names but without much of the essence of what had made them who they were before in the previous sections of the book。Somehow I feel as though I should have hated this chopping and changing of characters。 But it works, and it works incredibly well。 Across the expanse of the book, I found myself piecing together parts of the different sections, subtle nods to the characters as they had been before。 Maybe I was reading too much into things。 Maybe I wasn't。 That's part of the experience of immersing yourself in this volume。It's a long book, hundreds and hundreds of pages, and it was intimidating to start into, but aside from a section in the middle that I found to move a bit more slowly than other parts of the story, it never felt as though I was trawling my way through hundreds of pages。 To Paradise reads almost as a series of short stories, in a sense。 There are so many characters, so many stories and so many emotions fit into these pages。 There's a true master of storytelling here。 Mostly I forgot that I was reading, and when I wasn't reading, I was finding excuses so that I could make it so that I was。For me, my favourite part of the book is the third section, which actually accounts for about half of the page count。 Between the characters, the setting and the story, I often found myself thinking that I could just have easily been reading an Ishiguro or Murakami novel。 It's dystopian, it moves quickly, but it takes its time to piece together for the reader what's actually happening。 And it doesn't give too much away。 The reader must work for it, and there is often some ambiguity which I felt really added to the story rather than seeming frustrating or confusing。 The suspense toward the end had me incredibly uneasy, a feat that for me, no book before now has managed with such tangibility。 This one was an easy five stars from me。 To paradise and beyond。 An excellent read。 。。。more

Adrian

I’ve finished this book about ten hours now and yet it feels early for a review。 Still, it’s fresh in my mind after reading it for nearly three weeks and if I don’t write something now, I might find it more difficult as time goes on。 Not that I will forget the book, I’m just not sure what I think about it。Initial reactions:-Far tooooooo long。 The middle story in particular felt like it would never end, for reasons I’ll expand on。 -Did I enjoy it? I’m not sure if you could say that。 Some of the w I’ve finished this book about ten hours now and yet it feels early for a review。 Still, it’s fresh in my mind after reading it for nearly three weeks and if I don’t write something now, I might find it more difficult as time goes on。 Not that I will forget the book, I’m just not sure what I think about it。Initial reactions:-Far tooooooo long。 The middle story in particular felt like it would never end, for reasons I’ll expand on。 -Did I enjoy it? I’m not sure if you could say that。 Some of the writing was entrancing, and some of the stories immersive。 I can say it was difficult but memorable and I don’t think I’ll be forgetting it for a while yet, especially the third part。Ok, so with that out of the way - This book is in three sections, that take place in 1893, 1993 and 2093。 The first is set in in Washington Square, New York。 The main character is David Bingham, an orphan who lives with his Grandfather。 The family is very much of old money, and were founders of the free states - a group of states who have broken away, still connected to the wider United States, but differing from the ‘Southern Colonies’ and ‘The West。’ Same sex marriage is the default spousal setting in this society, and though it may seem extremely liberal on first viewing it is still divided by class and race - the Binghams have servants and black people fleeing the south are given safe passage through the Free states on their way to Canada。 David is a lonely, sometimes sickly young man and his grandfather is trying to organise a marriage for him - this is how the original founding families maintain their grip on the upper echelons of society - but he has his own ideas on love and his future。I did find this part very readable and was invested in David’s story。 It had the feel of an Edith Wharton or Henry James novel。 Looking back, this was probably the part that I was most invested in。 I’m not going to say enjoyed。Part two is divided into two sections。 The first is set during another pandemic - that of the Aids criss of the 1990’s。 I quickly realised that the author was using the same names for the characters, which was a bit confusing and we were back in the same Washington Square apartment building。 It was good to be in a world that was slightly familiar but I did spend some time wondering what the connection was between these stories, and wondering exactly where this book was going。 The second half of part two are was where the book really began to sag for me。 I understood that it was about the colonisation of Hawaii, and maybe I’m just not interested in that enough, but it came in the form of what felt like the longest letter in literature。 There didn’t seem to be a break in it and I was all out of sympathy for the father character, who I ended up disliking for being so weak。 I just couldn’t get emotionally invested in this part and the writing became to annoy me - some of the sentences just meandered around the house。 I’d given up on names and connections by this stage and this section couldn’t end quickly enough for me。Eventually, I made it to Part three。 This is the largest section of the book, by my kindle reckoning twice the size of the other two stories, taking up 50% of the book。 I’d imagine that it’s this part that readers and reviewers will focus on the most。 It is set between 2050 and 2093 in a totalitarian, dystopian , barely recognisable, New York。 The far right has used successive pandemics to push through more draconian measures, and citizens live in different sections, depending on their social status and position in the regime。 It’s basically 1984 meets a nightmare version of where the present world seems to be going in a handcart。We’re following Charlie and her grandfather Charles in this part (names again)。 The grandfather is a scientist and his story is told in the form of letters - Charlie’s story is told in the first person narrative。 This is a place of relocation camps, crematoriums, waves of the virus that traumatically, affect children, containment centres that people don’t return from, and sure we can’t forget good ol’ global warming and hunger。 I really struggled with this at times。 This was the first fiction I have read that relates to the pandemic and it just felt really close to the bone and at times an utterly depressing vision of where society could go。 At the same time, I kept going as there is a narrative drive to this section that for me wasn’t present in the middle section and I was interested in the story of young Charlie。 Maybe there will never be a place where we can look back at pandemics in the rear view mirror。 But it felt too soon for me and I couldn't wait to get out of this nightmare of a place。This is the longest review I’ve ever written, as befitting a novel lasting 720 pages。 It’s a complex unwieldy beast of a book that I could never quite get to grips with in terms of how the stories connected。 There were recurring themes such as loneliness and love without affection, sexuality, orphans and role models, inheritance in terms of status and culture, but the book as a whole just felt cold and clinical at times with parts that never quite clicked together。 I read a novella just before I finished this novel and it felt like water on a desert- I just wanted a book that told a story with economical prose and descriptions, that was short and to the pointThere is a lot to recommend in this book, especially the first part and some of the third section, (depending on how ready you are for covid related fiction) and there were times when I disappeared into the writing。 It’s certainly memorable and it’s only by writing this review that I have helped to clarify how I felt it。 Maybe the problem is with me - but there just weren’t enough colours in this book, which is what I needed。 I’m not going to recommend it because I felt it didn't engage me enough but if you are about to embark on it, I wish you well。 I was going to say it would be a good book if you were going into isolation for a couple of weeks, but maybe not。Thanks to Netgalley and Picador for the ARCReview from here 。。。more

Thadeus

ARC PLS

Jill Westerman

Disturbing, unsettling from the outset and brilliant。This is a novel in 3 parts set over 3 centuries - 1893, 1993 and 2093。 Each part deals with love, relationships, sexuality and family within different social contexts。 The first is an alternative America, briefly it seems as if we are in familiar wealthy 19th century New York, but this quickly shifts when we see that same sex marriages are the norm。 The second part is set within the gay community, at a time when Aids was causing so many to die Disturbing, unsettling from the outset and brilliant。This is a novel in 3 parts set over 3 centuries - 1893, 1993 and 2093。 Each part deals with love, relationships, sexuality and family within different social contexts。 The first is an alternative America, briefly it seems as if we are in familiar wealthy 19th century New York, but this quickly shifts when we see that same sex marriages are the norm。 The second part is set within the gay community, at a time when Aids was causing so many to die and the third part is in a terrifying dystopian future。 Here all the fears you've ever had about totalitarianism, pandemics, climate crises are realised。 It can be a frustrating read。 Things aren't resolved and I was certainly left wanting more。 I wonder if Yanagihara makes a wry nod to this in the final part, when storytellers populate a main square and one comments that he will end before finishing a tale - to groans from the audience。 I hesitated about 4 or 5 stars for this book - I settled on 5 because it is brilliant, but it shook me in a way that isn't particularly welcome living as we are in the middle of a pandemic。 Thanks to the publisher and netgalley for a review copy。 。。。more

Connor Johnston

A gripping trio of stories that span two hundred years of America both past and future, real and imagined。 As the three queer main characters navigate their equally difficult epochs, their narratives resonate deeply and leave the reader sympathizing with their attempts to take control of their fate and freedom。 Yanagihara brings the stories together in a way that exhibits the cyclical nature of human existence—especially when that existence seems irrational。 The last story is an especially chill A gripping trio of stories that span two hundred years of America both past and future, real and imagined。 As the three queer main characters navigate their equally difficult epochs, their narratives resonate deeply and leave the reader sympathizing with their attempts to take control of their fate and freedom。 Yanagihara brings the stories together in a way that exhibits the cyclical nature of human existence—especially when that existence seems irrational。 The last story is an especially chilling speculation of a world that continues to be struck by pandemic after pandemic。 Finishing this just as the Omicron variant of Covid is becoming more worrisome made the emotion of it all the more visceral。 The three stories took me on such a ride and leaves you wondering about our future and what sort of paradise we hope to achieve—and if it could ever really be。 。。。more

Jess Trevaskis

Firstly, I will refrain from comparing this to A Little Life。 They are in no way similar - in style, plot, genre, character development or feeling。 To Paradise will not break your heart, or make you cry。 When I stared this book I was ready for something that would destroy me like A Little Life did, but it was unfair of me to assume that Hanya would produce a second book following the same themes as her best-seller。 These two novels cannot be compared and, if you try, I’m afraid you might be disa Firstly, I will refrain from comparing this to A Little Life。 They are in no way similar - in style, plot, genre, character development or feeling。 To Paradise will not break your heart, or make you cry。 When I stared this book I was ready for something that would destroy me like A Little Life did, but it was unfair of me to assume that Hanya would produce a second book following the same themes as her best-seller。 These two novels cannot be compared and, if you try, I’m afraid you might be disappointed like I initially was。 However, the more you read you will realise that To Paradise cannot be compared to anything you have ever read before and there will be no room for disappointment toward this unique and flawless work。 Hanya is one of the most skilled writers I have ever read。 To Paradise made this very clear - I loved each of the three stories despite the fact that the plots, genres and writing style was removed from what I usually enjoy to read。 The slowness of the writing style enables you to really understand and grow with each character, while developing a fully formed and detailed understanding of the world and time they live in。 There are three separate stories set in different points in time with different characters, following different storylines。 I won’t try to describe each as the blurb does, since it won’t do the complexity of each plot justice or make it sound as enthralling as it truly is。 Out of the three books, the third and final one was by far my favourite。 It was very confronting, given it told the story of a global pandemic, but it was the most gripping of all three stories。 Hanya wrote about this novel experience in such a well researched and believable way that, while it differed from our experience with COVID-19, it felt equally relatable and fictitious。 The other two books were just as enjoyable to read but, without the backdrop of a dystopian pandemic, less fast paced or gripping。 All the underlying themes Hanya included were so necessary and explored so thoroughly, while remaining subtle。 Some of these include racism, homophobia, love, sexuality, totalitarianism, family, loss, loneliness and, most notably, Hawai’i - its indigenous peoples, the land and its colonisation。 I look forward to rereading this book one day to make connections I didn’t the first time around。 。。。more

Tess

How on earth do you succinctly review a 700+ page book from a master novelist like Hanya Yanagihara, knowing that this book will be devoured and dissected by many in the months to come? Before we go any further, let me say that if you are looking for a similar experience to her masterpiece A LITTLE LIFE, you will not find it here。 This is not to say that TO PARADISE is not an epic novel that will keep you immersed and gripped, but I was not devastated after I put the book down and while it is sa How on earth do you succinctly review a 700+ page book from a master novelist like Hanya Yanagihara, knowing that this book will be devoured and dissected by many in the months to come? Before we go any further, let me say that if you are looking for a similar experience to her masterpiece A LITTLE LIFE, you will not find it here。 This is not to say that TO PARADISE is not an epic novel that will keep you immersed and gripped, but I was not devastated after I put the book down and while it is sad, it is not the same sort of sad A LITTLE LIFE left you with。 I feel that it must be impossible for an author to live up to such high expectations, so Yanagihara just wrote the book she wanted to write and some will love it and some will hate it。 The book is split into three parts, all depicting an alternative reality or dystopian future of America, specifically lower Manhattan。 The first part takes place in 1893 and was my favorite part by far。 It reads like a 19th century novel with a plot that grips and a cliffhanger that will leave you yelling。 The middle part is set in the 1990s, where we learn about a young gay Hawaiian man who has made a new life for himself in NYC, and what he left behind in the islands。 The final part, which is actually exactly the second half of the book, is a depressing dystopian look into the late 21st century with a plot that slowly describes plague and pandemics ravaging the world。 This was the hardest part to read, and may be triggering to many as it can only be described as "too soon?" After what we all are going through right now, being immersed for 400 pages in a world that only gets worse from here is bleak and, unfortunately, I also found this part to be the weakest part of the novel。 I realize the three parts didn't have to be interwoven, but I wanted that to happen, especially for a 700 page novel。 Cohesion is not always necessary, but it would have been appreciated。 Queerness, sickness, patriotism, and LGBT relationships are threads throughout and they are big themes spread out through all 3 stories。 I admire Yanagihara's thesis about what utopia means, and how easy an alternative reality of this country could have been (and the ramifications of that)。 The pacing is slow and the book itself is sometimes a page-turner, and sometimes not。 It's an ordeal, an undertaking, and I cannot wait until we can all talk about it as I'm sure the opinions of those smarter than me will perhaps change my outlook。 This one might not be a masterpiece, but it's certainly a success。 。。。more

Hiba Arrame

Yes, because my sadness over being unable to attend the BTS concert in LA isn't enough。 Go ahead, I am ready to have my heart wrenched out and trampled。 Yes, because my sadness over being unable to attend the BTS concert in LA isn't enough。 Go ahead, I am ready to have my heart wrenched out and trampled。 。。。more

Anna

I went into this kinda expecting it to be another a little life but it ended up being way less traumatizing but reeeeeally interesting。 Even tho its almost 900 pages I still didn't want it to end。 overall a perfect read honestly I went into this kinda expecting it to be another a little life but it ended up being way less traumatizing but reeeeeally interesting。 Even tho its almost 900 pages I still didn't want it to end。 overall a perfect read honestly 。。。more

Marieke du Pré

Three stories which seem to have nothing in common, connected by themes such as racism, sexuality, loneliness, migration, complex family relationships, a yearning to be loved, and illnesses。I wasn’t a fan of A Little Life。 In fact, I DNF。 I found it too sad, too graphic, too descriptive, too cruel。 And still, the part I read has been etched into my mind forever。 And that’s why I decided to read To Paradise。 I loved the author’s writing, and the premise reminded me of Cloud Cuckoo Land, another e Three stories which seem to have nothing in common, connected by themes such as racism, sexuality, loneliness, migration, complex family relationships, a yearning to be loved, and illnesses。I wasn’t a fan of A Little Life。 In fact, I DNF。 I found it too sad, too graphic, too descriptive, too cruel。 And still, the part I read has been etched into my mind forever。 And that’s why I decided to read To Paradise。 I loved the author’s writing, and the premise reminded me of Cloud Cuckoo Land, another epic tale with multiple timelines in different ages。 And that one is just one of my favorite reads of 2021。 The books couldn’t be different, though。 And still, if you look at those themes …The book is divided into three parts。 A story about David, a wealthy loner whose parents died from an infectious disease。 It’s 1893, and HY shows us an alternative America。 David lives in the free states where being queer is normal, but Black people aren’t allowed citizenship。 When he meets poor Edward, he falls head over heels。 But what are Edward’s intentions?Then the book moves to 1993, to Hawaiian David (the beautiful cover is a Hawaiian fisher boy in 1898, by Dutch painter Herbert Vos), being in a relationship with Charles, an older man, while AIDS and death are everywhere in the gay community。 When one of Charles’s friends is dying, David receives a letter from his estranged father。Finally, the last part of the book moves to a female first-person narrative。 Charlie is married, but doesn’t really know her husband, while pandemics, climate change, and a totalitarian regime control life。 This part goes back and forth from 2093 to forty/fifty years before, and also tells the story of Charlie’s grandfather Charles。 While the first two stories are pretty quiet, this one is scary as hell。The blurb calls the story a symphony, and I believe that description fits this book very well。 Slow and vulnerable at first。 Then turned on more firmly because of the increasing tension。 Switching again to a calmer pace like an intermezzo。 Then building up to a crescendo, becoming more and more bombastic until you are completely immersed。Some people love symphonies, and some people hate them。 And that will also be the case with To Paradise。 It’s a monstrosity, the pacing is rather slow, the sentences are long, and it isn’t easy to connect the stories。 This isn’t a book to read because you want to love the characters or laugh or cry。 The book radiates aloofness and is written in a rather formal language。 But it’s a warning to all of us and one to reflect on。 Because if we continue like this, the world might end up in terror and fear, and we’ll lose all the progress we’ve made。I doubted my rating。 The first two stories were definitely a four-star and sometimes even a five-star read, but the last story was long, and it felt a bit too … much? All those pandemics and zones and numbers, and huge information dumps 。。。 But it’s also the only one which gave me a lump in my throat, and the stories together made me muse and think about our world right now。 And that’s why, in the end, I rated the whole book four stars。 I truly hope we and our kids and grandkids will never end up in so much fear。If, after reading my review, you think this book might be too much for you (particularly part III) and you like YA, check out The Outrage by William Hussey。 Similar themes (without the pandemics) and so much easier to read。I received an ARC from Pan Macmillan, Picador and NetGalley in exchange for an honest review。 。。。more

Vix Standen

(3。9 stars rounded up) I knew nothing about this book before I started reading。 I hadn’t read the synopsis; I wanted to go into it as I’d gone into A Little Life and go where the tide took me。 And, boy, I wasn’t expecting such a choppy ride! I’ll put the rest in the next paragraph in case you too don’t want to know anything……。。……the first part was perfect。 It moved me and nearly made me cry at points。 Every emotion was covered and tugged at and ripped and rebuilt。 I loved it。 I was shocked and j (3。9 stars rounded up) I knew nothing about this book before I started reading。 I hadn’t read the synopsis; I wanted to go into it as I’d gone into A Little Life and go where the tide took me。 And, boy, I wasn’t expecting such a choppy ride! I’ll put the rest in the next paragraph in case you too don’t want to know anything……。。……the first part was perfect。 It moved me and nearly made me cry at points。 Every emotion was covered and tugged at and ripped and rebuilt。 I loved it。 I was shocked and jolted to suddenly find myself thrown into part two and had no idea what I’d missed, leading me to check online that my Kindle wasn’t playing tricks on me。 I was gutted to find that we wouldn’t be returning to part one and I would never find out what happened。 This disappointment carried me through part two, which I didn’t enjoy nearly half as much。 I was glad that it was the shortest part of the three。 By the time I was jolted to the finale, the longest part, I was a bit more prepared for the rest of this voyage, almost as though I’d been handed some motion sickness tablets。 And I really did need them, ‘cause we were chucked about so much in this third part。 I’ll admit that it took a lot of work to follow the threads and the characters as I found myself thinking back to their previous storylines and incarnations (if they did indeed have previous incarnations?!)… my interest did wane at points, perhaps because of the last two years we’ve all gone through in our real lives。 The whole book was HUGE in so many ways and I don’t totally know yet how to wrap my head around it all。 You could easily write a dissertation on the whole thing, so my paltry review here will never do justice to its mind-bending grandeur and I’m hesitant to offer any kind of neat summary or conclusion!? So maybe I’ll just leave it hanging and end things here? bye 。。。more

Rachel

Let’s get this out of the way right off the bat, since I’ve seen a lot of others post about it—I will allay your fears and say this book will not tear you in two like A Little Life did。 There were no tears from me, while I cried so hard at ALL that I woke up the next day with pink eye in both eyes, after rubbing them so furiously the night before。The similarity is that this book, too, is a masterpiece, albeit a less masochistic one。 An alternate history told in three parts, the final section bei Let’s get this out of the way right off the bat, since I’ve seen a lot of others post about it—I will allay your fears and say this book will not tear you in two like A Little Life did。 There were no tears from me, while I cried so hard at ALL that I woke up the next day with pink eye in both eyes, after rubbing them so furiously the night before。The similarity is that this book, too, is a masterpiece, albeit a less masochistic one。 An alternate history told in three parts, the final section being a dystopian tale taking place in a future version of New York that has been ravaged by multiple pandemics。 I picked up the book not knowing it ended with such a bleak, sometimes triggering, section, so those looking to avoid any parallels to current events may want to skip this book for now。 But I will tell you that the 700+ pages flew by and did not leave me bereft like its predecessor。 。。。more

Des✨✨

Okay so imma leave this at a 5/5 for now because I already know I'll probably love this-BUT- the summary scares me? It genuinely terrifies me。 Already pre-ordered this bitch and I'm not ready。 A Little Life killed me, this will probably dig my grave for me- Okay so imma leave this at a 5/5 for now because I already know I'll probably love this-BUT- the summary scares me? It genuinely terrifies me。 Already pre-ordered this bitch and I'm not ready。 A Little Life killed me, this will probably dig my grave for me- 。。。more

J。Paul (inactive because of drafting)

wreck me, Hanya, i dare you!a little life didn't make me cry。 i hope this one can。 wreck me, Hanya, i dare you!a little life didn't make me cry。 i hope this one can。 。。。more

Jennie Godfrey

I have been thinking what to write in my review of this ever since I finished reading it last night。 What a book! A sequel to ‘A Little Life’ this is not, yet the themes and scope of the book are, if anything, even wider and more universal。 This is a book that looks at sexuality, climate, the future, the past, survival, the politics of a pandemic and everything in between。 With characters that grab you, so much so that when you move onto a different part of the book, you miss them, this can only I have been thinking what to write in my review of this ever since I finished reading it last night。 What a book! A sequel to ‘A Little Life’ this is not, yet the themes and scope of the book are, if anything, even wider and more universal。 This is a book that looks at sexuality, climate, the future, the past, survival, the politics of a pandemic and everything in between。 With characters that grab you, so much so that when you move onto a different part of the book, you miss them, this can only be described as epic。 。。。more

Cory Aitchison

I just finished。 I can't say whether or not I liked it yet, but it was compelling and thought-provoking。The novel starts out strong: 1893 in an alternate timeline of America, where there are seemingly three countries on what we call the United States。 The main character, David, is expected to marry soon。 The major themes are love, class, race, privilege, and the difference between freedom from obligations versus protected freedoms of the law。The second section takes place in 1993 New York, where I just finished。 I can't say whether or not I liked it yet, but it was compelling and thought-provoking。The novel starts out strong: 1893 in an alternate timeline of America, where there are seemingly three countries on what we call the United States。 The main character, David, is expected to marry soon。 The major themes are love, class, race, privilege, and the difference between freedom from obligations versus protected freedoms of the law。The second section takes place in 1993 New York, where another character named David/Kawika is living with his much older partner, Charles。 It explores his upbringing in Hawaii and his emotionally disturbed father (also named David/Kawika)。 The major themes are similar: death, privilege, heritage, class, upbringing, nationalism, and what happens when you let someone influence your choices beyond reason。 I found this section to be the most interesting, as it explores a very timely topic of legacy: who gets to keep their legacy, who gets to claim it, how does it tie to the future?The third (and longest) section takes place in 2093, in a world ravaged by pandemics, climate change, and autocracy。 The narration splits between the 2090s, with alternating chapters from the perspective of the narrator's grandfather, starting from the 2040s to the 2080s。 This section was the most involved in terms of world-building and explanation, but in my opinion, it was the weakest of the three parts of the novel。 I found some of the plotting to be stilted and clumsy, and found it frustrating that the one fully-formed woman character was still pretty empty。Overall, I enjoyed the experience of reading this book。 It was unclear to me if these three sections were supposed to be within the same "universe" as it were, with the characters being descendants of the previous sections (all three sections utilize the same names), or if the novel should be treated more as vignettes of what America (as a concept and a country) had and have the potential of being and becoming。 I think the vagueness is intentional。I have a feeling some people will be very upset by this book, for various reasons。 For one, there are very few female characters in the novel, and most of them are one dimensional。 (I understand the choices she is making here, but I think people will find it upsetting。) A lot of the characters are gay men。 (A common occurrence in her work。。。I do not believe the author identifies as a gay man。) A lot of characters are of native Hawaiian descent。 (I understand Yanagihara was raised in Hawaii, but as far as I know she is not of native Hawaiian descent。)There are also a lot of upsetting situations, especially in the third section of the book, that may be triggering for some people。Ultimately, I think "To Paradise" will be talked about a lot next year, praised by some, harshly critiqued by others, and all of it will be valid。 But the themes in the book are important conversations we should be having as a nation, and I will certainly be recommending it to people who are familiar with "A Little Life," who like speculative fiction, who enjoy books with lots of LGBTQ characters (emphasis on the G though), and those that enjoy dense and complicated stories with heavy themes。 。。。more

Jonathan

Definitely not what I expected, and my expectations were quite high。 To be honest I'm not quite sure what I thought of it, other than that I enjoyed the last half much more than the first。 The book is divided into three time periods, with characters who are related over the (roughly) 250 years, although there is little sense of family other than the immediate intergenerational relationships in each part。 Being set in a New York that is not part of the USA as we know it gives rise to the opportun Definitely not what I expected, and my expectations were quite high。 To be honest I'm not quite sure what I thought of it, other than that I enjoyed the last half much more than the first。 The book is divided into three time periods, with characters who are related over the (roughly) 250 years, although there is little sense of family other than the immediate intergenerational relationships in each part。 Being set in a New York that is not part of the USA as we know it gives rise to the opportunity to play with the historical elements of the story along with the (hopefully) unlikely plot of the futuristic ones。 I clearly don't want to give too much away, so will just let those who are interested in reading it judge for themselves。 。。。more

Jonathan

this is the first time in my life that i have pre-ordered a book

Jaclyn

It’s rare for a novel to ask such impossibly large questions of a nation: who were we, who are we, who might we yet become? What is true freedom? How do we confront the legacies of colonialism? And while we’re at it let’s look with clear eyes at the painful depths of loneliness and shame central to our humanity。 Part one made me think of Philip Roth and I couldn’t shake it。 I also kept thinking that Michelle de Kretser’s Scary Monsters grapples with similar themes in a much tighter way。 The stru It’s rare for a novel to ask such impossibly large questions of a nation: who were we, who are we, who might we yet become? What is true freedom? How do we confront the legacies of colonialism? And while we’re at it let’s look with clear eyes at the painful depths of loneliness and shame central to our humanity。 Part one made me think of Philip Roth and I couldn’t shake it。 I also kept thinking that Michelle de Kretser’s Scary Monsters grapples with similar themes in a much tighter way。 The structural dexterity if part three is a thing to behold。 One of Yanigahara’s many gifts is her ability to create characters, almost always gay men, you truly care about。 Here she places those characters in three settings in three distinct sections: an alternate historical New York, 1990s New York in the peak of the AIDS crisis and Hawaii, and a virus infested future New York。 The weighty themes bounce through the three parts and there are no easy answers to her many, many questions and preoccupations。 I have a lot more to say but for now will only add that you should not read To Paradise expecting A Little Life (it’s actually closer to The People in the Trees)。 It’s not harrowing and you’re unlikely to cry even once。 It is ambitious though and I love it when fiction is ambitious。 That she was brave enough to write anything after A Little Life is enough for me。 。。。more

Megan Cushman

glad we're all on the same page that we can't wait to be absolutely EMOTIONALLY destroyed by this book <3 glad we're all on the same page that we can't wait to be absolutely EMOTIONALLY destroyed by this book <3 。。。more

Hunter

To Paradise is a triptych novel exploring ideas of a past, present, and future America。 I have a deep love for Yanagihara’s work—I found her previous books to be beautiful, well-crafted, controversial。 With To Paradise, we see the same stellar prose, and her ability to create fascinating character dynamics elicits the same magnetic charge。 Yanagihara has an ability to capture moments of awkwardness and startling honesty in a way that is almost unparalleled。 But, as early as the first section, I To Paradise is a triptych novel exploring ideas of a past, present, and future America。 I have a deep love for Yanagihara’s work—I found her previous books to be beautiful, well-crafted, controversial。 With To Paradise, we see the same stellar prose, and her ability to create fascinating character dynamics elicits the same magnetic charge。 Yanagihara has an ability to capture moments of awkwardness and startling honesty in a way that is almost unparalleled。 But, as early as the first section, I began to feel a sense of unease。 Part One is set in an alternate 1893 America, where we learn that queerness—at least, being a gay white male—isn’t an issue。 Racism is still prevalent, which I find believable even in a “utopian” society, but when the protagonist and his lover communicate racist ideas, I felt that the authorial voice left it unaddressed。 This alternate America shapes the dynamic of the opening section, but it felt more like set dressing than a useful framework for what it was intended to communicate about our society。 While I think it’s a compelling part of the book, I have qualms。 Part Two, set in 1993, starts with more gay men, and there’s a lot of talk about AIDS, which I understand given the timeline, but I also didn’t care for how it was handled。 I did enjoy more of the second section of part two, which follows a father’s storyline, in Hawaii—this section addresses the colonization of Hawaii, and I think might be the most successful of the social critiques。 There were moments when I wished this section had been expanded, because of all the characters, I found them the most interesting and their story the most moving。 Part Three takes place in 2093, and is about as compelling as Part One, but the epistolary sections dragged a bit。 It’s interesting to know that Yanagihara began this pre-pandemic, given how timely it is—I found some of the politics of this section to be the inverse of what we’re seeing now。 I’m not sure if that’s due to this alternate America or not。 I did find it troubling that one of the characters appears to have developed autism spectrum disorder due to an antiviral drug, and wondered if Hanya was a fan of Jenny McCarthy or if it was simply coincidence。 There were some truly beautiful and moving moments in this final section, and I did eventually get invested in these characters too。 While several aspects of this book didn’t work for me, it has led me to really consider the ideas presented and I think it would be a great book club selection。 It’s definitely a book I can see initiating lively discussion。 。。。more

Kim McGee

3 1/2 starsThree stories in different timelines that connect with common themes。 The first takes place in an alternative "Free States" America in 1893。 David is born into a wealthy family and his grandfather is trying to marry him off to an older gentleman but David is secretly in love with a less worthy man who might be a hustler。 The second story is more familiar 1980's America caught in the HIV/AIDS crisis。 The third story is the longest and takes place in the faraway future where a series of 3 1/2 starsThree stories in different timelines that connect with common themes。 The first takes place in an alternative "Free States" America in 1893。 David is born into a wealthy family and his grandfather is trying to marry him off to an older gentleman but David is secretly in love with a less worthy man who might be a hustler。 The second story is more familiar 1980's America caught in the HIV/AIDS crisis。 The third story is the longest and takes place in the faraway future where a series of shattering viruses , climate change and living under a totalitarian government add up to less than a desirable vision of the future。 Many of the same names are used in the three stories so it can be a bit confusing and I wanted to think of them as related to each other。 The overwhelming themes that I took from this 700 page tome is the longing for love, loneliness, the need to pull away from meddling family and a connection to being of Hawaiian descent (although it is not a Hawaii we recognize)。 It was refreshing to think of relationships and marriage as between two people without caring if that was between a man/woman, man/man or woman/woman。 The writing is emotional and deep and it will quietly pull you in。 My thanks to the publisher for the advance copy。 。。。more