Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym

Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym

  • Downloads:7062
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-03-27 14:16:41
  • Update Date:2025-09-07
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Daniel Kahneman
  • ISBN:8372786771
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Czy ludzie są świadomymi i autonomicznymi autorami własnych wyborów i osądów?

Czy mogą ufać własnemu myśleniu, zwłaszcza temu szybkiemu – intuicyjnemu i emocjonalnemu? Rozważniej jest na pewno zdać się na myślenie wolne, analityczne。 A mimo to trudno uniknąć pułapek myślenia。 Przytrafia się to nawet ekonomistom i nie sprzyja podejmowaniu trafnych decyzji…

W tej odkrywczej książce Daniel Kahneman, psycholog, laureat Nagrody Nobla w dziedzinie ekonomii, rozważa te zagadnienia i daje istotny wgląd w mechanizmy ludzkiego myślenia。

Jest to książka przełomowa。 Kahneman objaśnia nam działanie umysłu i opisuje, jak o naszym myśleniu wspólnie decydują dwa systemy: System 1 – szybki, intuicyjny i emocjonalny oraz System 2 – wolniejszy, działający w sposób bardziej przemyślany i logiczny。 Kahneman odkrywa przed nami niezwykłe możliwości – ale też błędy i usterki – szybkiego myślenia, wskazując wszechogarniający wpływ intuicyjnych wrażeń na nasze myśli i zachowania。

Download

Reviews

Guillermo

Muy interesante y aplicable, pero algo denso。

Nuno Oliveira

I completely loved it。 One of those readings that you are eager to end but at the same time wishing that it could last forever。 It’s impossible to be indifferent to the heuristics of thought and bias of perception that are disclosed during the different chapters。 Someone who says that didn’t learn anything with this masterpiece is either lying or missed completely the geniality of this book。

Sheeraz

A fairly comprehensive view into decision-making and the frequent push and pull between the fast intuitive system and the slow analytical system。 The author points out a plethora of studies showing different biases that might emerge especially when the fast system is involuntarily employed。 Some of the interesting ones: how representation can lead to overestimates of quantities, like there appears to be more divorced celebrities than divorced doctors just because the former get talked about more A fairly comprehensive view into decision-making and the frequent push and pull between the fast intuitive system and the slow analytical system。 The author points out a plethora of studies showing different biases that might emerge especially when the fast system is involuntarily employed。 Some of the interesting ones: how representation can lead to overestimates of quantities, like there appears to be more divorced celebrities than divorced doctors just because the former get talked about more; or how conjunction of events might be perceived as more likely than constituting events, like it appears more likely for a person to be an organized librarian, than organized or librarian; or how we are more miserable when something is gained and subsequently taken away as opposed to just not getting it; or how we tend to neglect duration and focus more on peaks and end of an experience, like holding onto a bad memory of a movie if just the ending was poor。There is a whole lot more here, and after a point, it does get repetitive making me wish there was a condensed version with fewer studies investigating the same or similar phenomenon。 In practical sense, I do find myself pause and reflect a little more when I reach a decision extremely fast。 It's extremely unlikely that I would be immune to these biases, but the book gives you a background to talk about these as and when you do encounter and recognize these biases。 。。。more

Jojo

Are we rational?Thinking, fast and slow written by a Nobel laureate, Prof。 Daniel Kanehman, explores human decision, thinking process, and making sense of life。 The author created two fictitious characters: System 1 and System 2 to represent two modes of our thinking process。 System 1 works fast and efficiently, yet unreliable and emotion-based。 System 2, on the other hand, provides more accurate decisions, but its processing is slower。In day-to-day living, our thinking is largely governed by th Are we rational?Thinking, fast and slow written by a Nobel laureate, Prof。 Daniel Kanehman, explores human decision, thinking process, and making sense of life。 The author created two fictitious characters: System 1 and System 2 to represent two modes of our thinking process。 System 1 works fast and efficiently, yet unreliable and emotion-based。 System 2, on the other hand, provides more accurate decisions, but its processing is slower。In day-to-day living, our thinking is largely governed by the automatic system 1, and only slightly that is monitored by the effortful system 2。The content in this book is unsummarizable as it is applicable in various aspects。 The disciplines that enjoy the most profits are behavioral Economics, social sciences, politics, and public health。One thing that I personally would like to emphasize is that our brain is made and fine-tuned for the enhancement of our survival, yet it is not designed to differentiate between reality and illusion。This book provides a strong, compelling, and evidence-based answer that we, as humans, are not rational as we may think。 And it is apparent that we prefer to rely on our intuition for making numerous life choices。Although this book is not an easy read and the content is difficult to digest, I had a pleasant and thought-provoking experience reading this book。 。。。more

Nada Fouad

Excellent book and extremely knowledgeable! I really liked the book so much!

Moran

Fascinating concepts presented in a messy way。 Too many examples, no conclusions, and lots of redundant information。 Disappointing for an international bestseller written by a nobel laureate。

Laura Adams

It took me a while, but I learned a lot and I would recommend it。

Amanda Madany

Wow, I'm definitely going to be rereading this one and taking the lessons I learned with me throughout life。 I wish I could pick Kahneman's brain。 Wow, I'm definitely going to be rereading this one and taking the lessons I learned with me throughout life。 I wish I could pick Kahneman's brain。 。。。more

Werther Veulemans

Absolutely a madness book, makes you wonder in what world we live and how humans are designed to be biased and irrational。 Should be an obligation to read this book, especially for people who need to make important decisions。 Pretty dense book, but worth it!

Alexandra Matinez

Dropped it。 Poor writing, no examples, and soooo many pages to describe quick decision making vs analyzed thoughts。

Ayham

I didnt finish it, it is more suitable as academic research book, since it is too wordy for public。

Ioana Crețu

Citire lentă。

Tara Franz

Glad I finally went back and read this after starting it years ago。 So many great concepts to understand people, decisions and thinking better。 Referenced a lot of other work I've read and loved too, so it's nice to see them discussed together。 Glad I finally went back and read this after starting it years ago。 So many great concepts to understand people, decisions and thinking better。 Referenced a lot of other work I've read and loved too, so it's nice to see them discussed together。 。。。more

Charles Carlson

The general thesis is good and makes sense。 This book could probably be written in 1/3 the space and be just as effective。

Madara

I will never trust another decision of mine!!!

Isaac Chan

Was groundbreaking in its time, but its essence and findings have largely been assimilated into the wider behavioral economics field, which detracts the awe of reading。 Still, it is undeniable that Kahneman's prose makes for a pleasant read。 Would think twice next time I call a long shot in a wild attempt to salvage some bleak gains。 Was groundbreaking in its time, but its essence and findings have largely been assimilated into the wider behavioral economics field, which detracts the awe of reading。 Still, it is undeniable that Kahneman's prose makes for a pleasant read。 Would think twice next time I call a long shot in a wild attempt to salvage some bleak gains。 。。。more

Ali Alsaffar

علمياً: كتاب ثري، كنت ارى انه في بعض الاحيان يميل اسلوب الكتابة الى الجمود فتأولت ان تكون الاسباب مني ولكن طالعت بعض المراجعات ههنا وقد اشاروا الى ذلك الامر نفسه。لكن ثراه العلمي المعرفي -اي الكتاب- يغلب على بعض جمود اسلوبه。 بالمجمل هذا كتاب عن علم النفس فليس من الشرط ان يكون ذا اسلوبا سهلاً。ينصح بقرائته ولكن استزيد بالنصح بالتمسك بكلام الكاتب عندما قال: إنَّ لا وجود لشخصيتان في داخل الانسان وإنما هما -كما كرر مِراراً وتَكراراً- شخصيتان وهميتان。وانا اقول: أنَّ هذا نموذج تفسيري له قوة تفسيرية جيدة علمياً: كتاب ثري، كنت ارى انه في بعض الاحيان يميل اسلوب الكتابة الى الجمود فتأولت ان تكون الاسباب مني ولكن طالعت بعض المراجعات ههنا وقد اشاروا الى ذلك الامر نفسه。لكن ثراه العلمي المعرفي -اي الكتاب- يغلب على بعض جمود اسلوبه。 بالمجمل هذا كتاب عن علم النفس فليس من الشرط ان يكون ذا اسلوبا سهلاً。ينصح بقرائته ولكن استزيد بالنصح بالتمسك بكلام الكاتب عندما قال: إنَّ لا وجود لشخصيتان في داخل الانسان وإنما هما -كما كرر مِراراً وتَكراراً- شخصيتان وهميتان。وانا اقول: أنَّ هذا نموذج تفسيري له قوة تفسيرية جيدة فلا داعي للمغالاة بالنموذج وتصديره للعالم كحقيقة مطلقة وتَستلزِم لِكُل آدمي ان يكون عنده وجدانان وعقلان وشخصيتان。واردت ذكر هذا لان هناك من الناس من يغالي بهذا ويقع في نوع من الجبرية على انه غير متمسك بزمام أمره وأنَّه واقعٌ تحت سلطةِ "عقله الباطن" او كما يسميه دانيل “system 1”。 عموماً لا انوي إختصار الكتاب هنا واجزم أنَّني ما وصلت حتى لقشرتِهِ。 。。。more

Elizabeth

This book read a bit too much like a psychology textbook for me, especially because I've been spending so much time reading academic articles。 The conclusions were interesting, but parts felt a bit presumptuous, which is funny for a book about assumptions。 Overall a useful read, but quite long and not ideal for an audiobook。 This book read a bit too much like a psychology textbook for me, especially because I've been spending so much time reading academic articles。 The conclusions were interesting, but parts felt a bit presumptuous, which is funny for a book about assumptions。 Overall a useful read, but quite long and not ideal for an audiobook。 。。。more

Bets Bersson

Same complaint as usual。 Unnecessarily long。

Jim England

Must-read for all product people

Sergei Bobrov

Максимально крутая книжка。 О том, что у человека две разные системы。 Автоматическая система один, и прилагающая усилия система два。 Они часто в конфликте и часто из-за системы один у нас много неправильных действий。 Но и система два не идеально и частенько жесточайше косячит。 Мы - не рациональны и часто действуем не логично, автор приводит хорошие примеры и объяснения, многое встает на свои места - почему вокруг полно тупарезов。 Советую к прочтению

Pooja Saxena

a Must

Manish Pandey

Good book to read one time to understand how our thought process work。 Book is well distributed in chapters but feels too many of them at times。 Knowing how our fast reaction and slow thinking work, we should be able to use them more often in more controlled way then automatic selection by our brain。

Tiffany

I thought this was going to be more along the lines of Malcolm Gladwell, but it definitely was not。 It was a lot more statistical analysis than psychological analysis。 Also, I listened to the audiobook and it kept referring to a PDF。 I got this from my library's app, so maybe I could've gotten the PDF somewhere, but even if I could, I choose audiobooks because I can do other things while listening。 Having to constantly reference a PDF doesn't really lend itself to that。 I thought this was going to be more along the lines of Malcolm Gladwell, but it definitely was not。 It was a lot more statistical analysis than psychological analysis。 Also, I listened to the audiobook and it kept referring to a PDF。 I got this from my library's app, so maybe I could've gotten the PDF somewhere, but even if I could, I choose audiobooks because I can do other things while listening。 Having to constantly reference a PDF doesn't really lend itself to that。 。。。more

خالد احمد

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers。 To view it, click here。 جيد جدا كانني لم أقراء كتابا من قبل

Rakesh Vasita

Well it's nice book but I found it very complicated but anyway good book Well it's nice book but I found it very complicated but anyway good book 。。。more

Keoni Sanny

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers。 To view it, click here。 Note sure how to add personal notes when not on Kindle。Page 40: 'Fortunately, cognitive work is not always aversive, and people sometimes expend considerable effort for long periods of time without having to exert willpower。 [。。。] People who experience flow describe it as "a state of effortless concentration so deep that they lose their sense of time, of themselves, of their problems," and their descriptions of the joy of that state are so compelling that Csikszentmihalyi has called it an "optim Note sure how to add personal notes when not on Kindle。Page 40: 'Fortunately, cognitive work is not always aversive, and people sometimes expend considerable effort for long periods of time without having to exert willpower。 [。。。] People who experience flow describe it as "a state of effortless concentration so deep that they lose their sense of time, of themselves, of their problems," and their descriptions of the joy of that state are so compelling that Csikszentmihalyi has called it an "optimal experience。"'Page 41: 'People who are cognitively busy are also more likely to make selfish choices, use sexist language, and make superficial judgments in social situations。 [。。。] A few drinks have the same effect, as does a sleepless night。'Page 41: 'Baumeister's group has repeatedly found that an effort of will or self-control is tiring; if you have had to force yourself to do something, you are less willing or less able to exert self-control when the next challenge comes around。 The phenomenon has been named ego depletion。' Affects ability to maintain physical stamina as well。Page 43: 'The most surprising discovery made by Baumeister's group shows, as he puts it that the idea of mental energy is more than a mere metaphor。 [。。。] When you are actively involved in difficult cognitive reasoning or engaged in a task that requires self-control, your blood glucose level drops。'Page 49: 'However, Stanovich argues that high intelligence does not make people immune to biases。 Another ability is involved, which he labels rationality。 [。。。] In his view, superficial or "lazy" thinking is a flaw of the reflective mind, a failure of rationality。 [。。。] In support of it, Stanovich and his colleagues have found that the bat-and-ball question and others like it are somewhat better indicators of our susceptibility to cognitive errors than are conventional measures of intelligence, such as IQ tests。'Page 51: 'As cognitive scientists have emphasized in recent years, cognition is embodied; you think with your body, not only with your brain。'Page 69: '[。。。] when in a good mood, people become more intuitive and more creative but also less vigilant and more prone to logical errors。'Page 75: 'In fact, all the headlines do is satisfy our need for coherence: a large event is supposed to have consequences, and consequences need causes to explain them。 We have limited information about what happened on a day, and System 1 is adept at finding a coherent causal story that links the fragments of knowledge at its disposal。'Page 77: 'The psychologist Paul Bloom, writing in The Atlantic in 2005, presented the provocative claim that our inborn readiness to separate physical and intentional causality explains the near universality of religious beliefs。 He observes that "we perceive the world of objects as essentially separate from the world of minds, making it possible for us to envision soulless bodies and bodiless souls。"'Page 81: 'The moral is significant: when System 2 is otherwise engaged, we will believe almost anything。 System 1 is gullible and biased to believe, System 2 is in charge of doubting and unbelieving, but System 2 is sometimes busy, and often lazy。'Page 81: 'Contrary to the rules of philosophers of science, who advise testing hypotheses by trying to refute them, people (and scientists, quite often) seek data that are likely to be compatible with the beliefs they currently hold。'Page 82: 'The tendency to like (or dislike) everything about a person - including things you have not observed - is known as the halo effect。 [。。。] The halo effect is also an example of suppressed ambiguity: like the word bank, the adjective stubborn is ambiguous and will be interpreted in a way that makes it coherent with the context。'Page 83: 'The sequence in which we observe characteristics of a person is often determined by chance。 Sequence matters, however, because the halo effect increases the weight of first impressions, sometimes to the point that subsequent information is mostly wasted。'Page 84: 'To derive the most useful information from multiple sources of evidence, you should always try to make these sources independent of each other。'Page 87: 'Indeed, you will often find that knowing little makes it easier to fit everything you know into a coherent pattern。'Page 90: 'In about 70% of the races for senator, congressman, and governor, the election winner was the candidate whose face had earned a higher rating of competence。'Page 91: 'Political scientists followed up on Todorov's initial research by identifying a category of voters for whom the automatic preferences of System 1 are particularly likely to play a large role。 They found what they were looking for among politically uninformed voters who watch a great deal of television。'Page 111: '[。。。] extreme outcomes (very high and/or very low cancer rates) are most likely to be found in sparsely populated counties。 This is all there is to the story。' 。。。more

Jacob Flath

A seriously phenomenal book, life-changing。 An absolute must-read。

Nicole Abiad

Read for a class。 I had encountered Khanemen's 2-system theory previously and was happy to read more on the in-depth rational behind it。 No, it is not a weekend read, but insightful if you have the time Read for a class。 I had encountered Khanemen's 2-system theory previously and was happy to read more on the in-depth rational behind it。 No, it is not a weekend read, but insightful if you have the time 。。。more

Alberto Guadagnino

Didattico, da leggere。。。