Science

Pandemia klamstw. Szokujaca prawda o skorumpowanym swiecie nauki i epidemiach, ktorych moglismy uniknac

Pandemia klamstw. Szokujaca prawda o skorumpowanym swiecie nauki i epidemiach, ktorych moglismy uniknac

  • Downloads：4830
  • Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date：2021-11-25 09:53:24
  • Update Date：2025-09-06
  • Status：finish
  • Author：Kent Heckenlively
  • ISBN：8366654095
  • Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
  • Download

Summary

“Kent Heckenlively and Judy Mikovits are the new dynamic duo fighting corruption in science。” —Ben Garrison， America's #1 political satirist

Dr。 Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin， a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her ground-breaking discoveries。 And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men， she uncovered decades old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried。

From her doctoral thesis， which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS， saving the lives of millions， including basketball great， Magic Johnson， to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses， and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health， Dr。 Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science。

With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology， Dr。 Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science。 When she was part of the research community which turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one she saw science at its best。 But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases， such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome， she saw science at its worst。 If her suspicions are correct， we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices， including how we study and treat human disease。

Recounting her nearly four decades in science， including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr。 Frank Ruscetti， one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology， this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity。

Download

Reviews

Angel Oakley ，

I greatly appreciated Robert Kennedy Jr。 doing the forward for this book。 Incredibly valuable book for those who want to understand some of the "behind the scenes" corruption happening in our regulating agencies。 I greatly appreciated Robert Kennedy Jr。 doing the forward for this book。 Incredibly valuable book for those who want to understand some of the "behind the scenes" corruption happening in our regulating agencies。 。。。more

Hina Ansari ，

I wanted to like this book， and the author is an expert， but she is no longer unbiased in any of her assessments。 What happened to her will happen in a system that we live in， but when she uses dog whistles like referencing Representative Ocasio-Cortez as a villain， she loses a huge chunk of credibility。 I was recommended this book by a friend， who is an antivaxxer and if you’re one too， this will fuel your conspiracy theories， but the story feels incomplete。

Iona Stewart ，

This is an important book， though I admit I did not understand much of it。 I owe my small comprehension of the book mostly to Robert F。 Kennedy， Jr。’s Foreword。 Judy Mikovits， one of the most skilled scientists of her generation， collaborated with Dr。 Frank Ruscetti in studying retroviruses and changing “the paradigm of HIV-AIDS treatment， turning the disease from a death sentence into a manageable condition”。 Mikovits always placed her scientific integrity ahead of personal ambition。 When she d This is an important book， though I admit I did not understand much of it。 I owe my small comprehension of the book mostly to Robert F。 Kennedy， Jr。’s Foreword。 Judy Mikovits， one of the most skilled scientists of her generation， collaborated with Dr。 Frank Ruscetti in studying retroviruses and changing “the paradigm of HIV-AIDS treatment， turning the disease from a death sentence into a manageable condition”。 Mikovits always placed her scientific integrity ahead of personal ambition。 When she discovered UpJohn’s formula for Bovine Growth Hormone could cause precancerous changes in human cell cultures， she refused direct orders to hide her discoveries。 She discovered that the “ubiquitous” presence of the hormone in milk could lead to breast cancer in women who drank it。 Her “war on BGH” eventually led to Upjohn abandoning the product。 Mikovits and Ruscetti discovered a strong association between a previously unknown retrovirus and chronic fatigue syndrome （ME/CFS）。 The retrovirus was also linked to certain blood cancers。 Mikovits found evidence for the retrovirus in approx。 67% of women afflicted with ME/CFS: When Mikovits and Ruscetti published their findings in the journal “Science” in 2009， describing the first-ever isolation of the retrovirus XMRV and its association to ME/CFS， their revelations “triggered angry reactions from jealous cancer power centers， stubbornly resistant to science that attributed cancer and neuroimmune diseases to viruses”。 Many of the female patients afflicted with XMRV had children with autism。 Mikovits found that 14 of 17 children she tested had the virus。 This was very troubling to the medical establishment。 Research also found widespread XMRV contamination in the blood supply and blood products。 From 3 to 8 percent of the American population now carry the virus。 Mouse tissue used in vaccine production was the likely “vector” for human contamination。 Co-author Kent Heckenlively had already published research showing that the first recorded outbreak of ME/CVS was among 198 doctors and nurses at the Los Angeles County Hospital in 1934-1935 after their ingestion with an experimental polio vaccine grown in mouse tissue。 Mikovits’ evidence “threatened financial catastrophe for the world’s pharmaceutical companies， because of their negligent use of animal cell cultures to produce vaccines and other pharmaceutical products”。 An entire branch of medicine called “biologics” which depends on animal tissue and products put billions of dollars of revenues at risk。 Judy was under surveillance – menacing-looking men followed her in pickup trucks。 In one incident， thugs surrounded her home， forcing her to flee in a boat。 The police arrested Judy without a warrant and held her in jail for five days without bail。 Her house was searched by police from top to bottom; her papers were strewed everywhere。 No charges have ever been filed against her but a campaign of vilification was launched against her by the pharmaceutical cartel。 All this is just a fraction of what Judy has been through。 Robert F。 Kennedy， Jr。 states “This account by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively is vitally important both to the health of our children and the vitality of our democracy。” I too found the book vitally important。 It exposes the vast corruption in science。 It is a depressing book。 Judy states that she wrote the book in order that science be guided back to its founding principles。 But I have to say that I stopped reading the book before I finished it; there was no point in continuing as I simply could not comprehend it。 I think perhaps you might have to be a scientist to do so。 But certain factors are clear， corruption in the field is rife and vaccines are deadly dangerous。 。。。more

Lola O'Brien ，

This should be a must read for everyone in our society today。 I couldn’t put it down。 Fascinating and enlightening。

Radosław Magiera ，

Tytuł wywołuje w związku z obecną sytuacją całkiem błędne skojarzenia， iż książka przynajmniej częściowo traktuje o COVID-19。 Wrażenie to wzmagają tendencyjne， delikatnie mówiąc， oceny jej autorów w mediach， również internetowych， o wiki nie wspominając， a także takie informacje jak podkreślanie faktu， że filmiki promujące tę pozycję były i są blokowane， ośmieszane i szkalowane we wszystkich mainstreamowych mediach。 Tymczasem jest to bardzo interesujące opracowanie popularnonaukowe （fakt， że wzb Tytuł wywołuje w związku z obecną sytuacją całkiem błędne skojarzenia， iż książka przynajmniej częściowo traktuje o COVID-19。 Wrażenie to wzmagają tendencyjne， delikatnie mówiąc， oceny jej autorów w mediach， również internetowych， o wiki nie wspominając， a także takie informacje jak podkreślanie faktu， że filmiki promujące tę pozycję były i są blokowane， ośmieszane i szkalowane we wszystkich mainstreamowych mediach。 Tymczasem jest to bardzo interesujące opracowanie popularnonaukowe （fakt， że wzbogacone o wątki osobiste） dotyczące bardzo drażliwych， lecz niezwykle ważnych i interesujących interdyscyplinarnych problemów。W książce można wyróżnić kilka przenikających i wiążących się warstw。Pierwsza， ale nie najważniejsza dla czytelnika， to osobista historia autorki， która poniosła konsekwencje cywilnej odwagi z jaką głosiła hipotezy sprzeciwiające się lansowanym przez media głównego nurtu， „naukę” i władze。 Historia pokazująca， że w demokracji można korzystać z wolności przekonań tylko o tyle， o ile nie są one sprzeczne z wielkimi interesami i wielkimi pieniędzmi。Druga to niezwykle ciekawy zbiór mniej lub bardziej znanych przypadków ilustrujących historię szykanowania i niszczenia， lecz przede wszystkim ośmieszania tych， którzy próbowali jako pierwsi wykazać， że dotychczasowe prawdy medyczne są nie tylko bzdurne， ale wręcz zbrodnicze。 Pierwszym przykładem， znanym również z wielu innych dzieł popularnonaukowych， jest oczywiście Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis， bojownik o wprowadzenie zwyczaju mycia rąk wśród lekarzy i personelu medycznego 。 Wątek bardzo ciekawy， ilustrujący jak to się stało i dlaczego， że do oporu jaki aż nazbyt często wszelkim nowościom stawiały środowiska medyczne， bezzasadnie posądzane o większą niż inne grupy zawodowe inteligencję， wrażliwość czy moralność， dołączyła szeroko rozumiana nauka， finanse i polityka。Trzecia to wątek stricte popularnonaukowy， który stał się głównym powodem ataku na tę książkę。 Dowiemy się z niego rzeczy， których próżno szukać w innych opracowaniach。 Przede wszystkim tego， czym się różnią szczepionki od wszelkich innych produktów medycznych， choćby od antybiotyków， narkotyków czy chemioterapeutyków， albo czym się różnią pojedyncze szczepienia （każde przeciw innej chorobie） od szczepionek zespolonych typu dwie lub trzy w jednym。 Teorie przedstawione w książce， na przykład ta wyjaśniająca paradoksalne pytanie - Jak to możliwe， że nagle teraz， w przeciągu krótkiego czasu， coraz to nowe chorobotwórcze czynniki pochodzenia odzwierzęcego przechodzą na ludzi， mimo iż ludzie przedmiotowe zwierzęta jedli od wieków i nic się nie działo？ – są bardzo przekonujące。 Dużo bardziej przekonujące niż idiotyzmy serwowane przez „autorytety” w telewizji i innych podobnych źródłach informacji。Na warstwę popularnonaukową nakłada się wątek zbioru faktów， na przykład działań głównego nurtu środowiska naukowego i władz， danych statystycznych i innych， które poprzez wyjaśnienie reakcji na omawiane problemy ukazują je w innym niż zwykle świetle。 Dla mnie szczególnie znaczące i interesujące， bo niepodważalne， stały się informacje o stanie prawnym szczepionek w USA （jedyne produkty， których wytwórców nie można pozywać przed sądy powszechne） i wyjaśnienie， jak i dlaczego do takiego ewenementu doszło。 Przerażające zaś okazały się na przykład dane dotyczące dynamiki autyzmu i innych chorób w ostatnich latach。Nie można o mnie powiedzieć， że jestem łatwowierny。 Chyba wszystko niemal， a zwłaszcza nowinki naukowe， traktuję jako hipotezy。 Tak zresztą chyba traktuje tę wiedzę każdy uczony， w przeciwieństwie do naukowców， którzy aż zbyt często wyniki najnowszych badań （zwłaszcza swoich） przedstawiają i traktują niczym dogmaty religijne， niczym prawdy objawione。 Mimo daleko posuniętego krytycyzmu muszę stwierdzić， że Pandemia kłamstw， niestety， jest dużo bardziej przekonująca niż wszelkie inne opracowania o tej tematyce， które dotąd poznałem， o wiedzy internetowo-telewizyjnej nie wspominając。 Niestety， gdyż wydźwięk całości jest， dla mnie przynajmniej， przerażający。 Mimo iż warstwa popularno-naukowa odbiorcom nie sięgającym zwykle po tego typu literaturę może przysporzyć nieco trudności， które jednak z pomocą internetu na pewno każdy zdoła pokonać， to myślę， że to pozycja must read w pełnym tego wyrażenia znaczeniu。 Choć nie dotyczy pandemii COVID， pozwala lepiej zrozumieć co się dzieje， dlaczego， i jakie są możliwe scenariusze na przyszłość。 Ja poznałem to opracowanie w formie audiobooka i muszę przyznać， że Bartosz Głogowski sprawił się na piąteczkę。 Choć nie do końca i nie ze wszystkim z autorami się zgadzam， absolutnie i gorąco polecam – to po prostu trzeba poznać i przemyślećźródło:https://klub-aa。blogspot。com/2021/10/。。。 。。。more

Jason ，

There is definitely a bitter tone in this book， however， if this is true， one can understand why。 She explains herself and why the same results were not achieved by others trying to prove her theory。 Her concepts make scientific since。 Science is based on correlations in results。 How many things have to correlate before a conspiracy theory actually becomes truth？ I'm sure during the Tuskegee Syphilis Trials there may have been some speculation that people were being used as pawns， but that was s There is definitely a bitter tone in this book， however， if this is true， one can understand why。 She explains herself and why the same results were not achieved by others trying to prove her theory。 Her concepts make scientific since。 Science is based on correlations in results。 How many things have to correlate before a conspiracy theory actually becomes truth？ I'm sure during the Tuskegee Syphilis Trials there may have been some speculation that people were being used as pawns， but that was silenced because people wouldn't do such a thing to other people。。。。or would they？ They did。 The tone of this book is one of hurt but this doctor's entire life's work is at stake。 She has been discredited by her peers in what appears to be unfair biased。 What do you think money and power will keep quiet？ Think for a minute that anyone in a high position of power in any government has your best interest at heart if you want。 Chances are they didn't get their power or accumulation of money caring about people。 So go ahead and trust them with your life。 Remember you're doing this for everyone else。。。。not for you。 This is not by any means the popular opinion。 It is even controversial。 Would you put yourself in this position if you didn't believe what you were writing。 I would not。 I hope that in 50 years history doesn't show that we were too stupid and lazy to protect ourselves， but I fear it will。 After all， how can it not， when the mass population just keeps saying "whatever is easiest， I just want to concede and move on。" Surely it can't be wrong if everybody is doing it。。。。。I think we learned to counter that type of thinking by the age of three， but how soon we forget。 Let us collectively find answers to develop a better world and not destroy another's thoughts without understanding their efforts。 。。。more

Rod ，

Some interesting and eye opening information。 Hard to look past a very bitter individual however。 Detracts from her message…

Krista ，

Novel-like， interesting info on retroviruses from animal cells in vaccines

Gerald Kinro ，

I enjoyed reading the theories and science of retroviruses。 However， towards the end the tone seemed to that of a whiner。 Is the government capable of coverups and fraud。 Yes。 Are scientists real people who will go to great lengths to protect their reputations？ Yes。 Did they do it in this case？ I do not know。 I have to hear more from all sides of the issue。 Yet it is a book that had to be published to give an opinion that should be scrutinized。 Of note， I got the impression that Ebola is fairly I enjoyed reading the theories and science of retroviruses。 However， towards the end the tone seemed to that of a whiner。 Is the government capable of coverups and fraud。 Yes。 Are scientists real people who will go to great lengths to protect their reputations？ Yes。 Did they do it in this case？ I do not know。 I have to hear more from all sides of the issue。 Yet it is a book that had to be published to give an opinion that should be scrutinized。 Of note， I got the impression that Ebola is fairly new。 However in a work by Richard Preston， the "ancient technique" is mentioned in fighting a communicable disease。 This includes seclusion， shunning， isolation， and quick sole disposable of corpses。 They must have had something going in ancient times。 。。。more

Paulina Knaga ，

A bit chaotic at the beggining but contains lots of hidden informations which people should know about。 Shows simple way to stay strong and healthy too。

Shaaf Matin ，

Wow……… big corporations are the real gangstas of the world。 Don’t trust the ‘science’ if big money is involved

Marie Carmean ，

Everyone needs to read this book！ It exposes the corruption rampant in the scientific community by corporations who stand to lose millions in lawsuits if certain things are revealed。 If you are concerned about any health issue from cancer to AIDS to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and autism and Alzheimers。。。almost any health issue， you need to be aware of the research on these diseases that has been done， tested and peer reviewed， only to be covered up。 If you are worried about Big Pharma， you have ne Everyone needs to read this book！ It exposes the corruption rampant in the scientific community by corporations who stand to lose millions in lawsuits if certain things are revealed。 If you are concerned about any health issue from cancer to AIDS to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and autism and Alzheimers。。。almost any health issue， you need to be aware of the research on these diseases that has been done， tested and peer reviewed， only to be covered up。 If you are worried about Big Pharma， you have need to be！ If you feel like we don't get the Big Picture all of the time， we don't。 Please read this book！ You will be healthier， and safer， and more ready to fight misinformation。 The forward was written by Robert Kennedy Jr。 and if you simply read his forward， you will be certain that the book you are about to read speaks only truth。 Do not approach your reading in a political way。。。approach it as a citizen of a free nation with the resources to fight cancer， autism and so many other ailments we are saddled with！ Read it as a person who cares about humanity and the dangers we face。 I just bought four more copies to share with friends and family。 。。。more

Megan ，

The only reason this review isn't 5 stars is because she could have used an editor to organize the content better and remove some of the repetition。 Otherwise this was an excellent book that was well-researched， full of truth， honesty， objectivism， and good science。 Any nay-sayers have not read the book in its entirety。 Readers should be open to the concepts Judy is talking about and should pursue the facts。 You do not need to take what she says at face value。 Look into it for yourself！ But if a The only reason this review isn't 5 stars is because she could have used an editor to organize the content better and remove some of the repetition。 Otherwise this was an excellent book that was well-researched， full of truth， honesty， objectivism， and good science。 Any nay-sayers have not read the book in its entirety。 Readers should be open to the concepts Judy is talking about and should pursue the facts。 You do not need to take what she says at face value。 Look into it for yourself！ But if and when you do， look outside the box， outside the mainstream narrative， and seek out other perspectives。 Too many people have chosen a side and that's it。 No budging。 They refuse to be open to the idea that their own perspective may be wrong or corrupted。 I choose to seek out truth， even when it looks controversial。 。。。more

Vijaya Bodach ，

Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively might be the most important book I've read this year。 However， it has not restored my faith in science。 On the contrary， it has diminished my trust in our health care system， particularly at the highest levels that issue forth guidelines。 From the food pyramid （maligning fats） to the vaccine guidelines， it's clear that our leaders do not care about our health nor the health of our children anym Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively might be the most important book I've read this year。 However， it has not restored my faith in science。 On the contrary， it has diminished my trust in our health care system， particularly at the highest levels that issue forth guidelines。 From the food pyramid （maligning fats） to the vaccine guidelines， it's clear that our leaders do not care about our health nor the health of our children anymore。 They might have started out with good intentions but when new data came forth showing the harm of certain products （like masks， certain vaccines）， the data have been shoved under the rug to protect the pockets of big companies who lobby many of our government institutions。 It's an incestuous relationship that benefits only them。 No wonder health care is a billion-dollar industry。 Beware。This book would make a good movie。 It's got dedicated yet naïve scientists who uncover interesting details of new diseases， villains （you'd think these are the bugs themselves， but sadly， it's other scientists or govt。 regulatory bodies）， and ethical questions at its core。 I devoured this book because I enjoy medical mysteries。 However， I realize that not everybody is interested in esoteric details or gossip between scientists。 So I recommend reading the Foreword and Introduction that's available with the "Look Inside" Feature。 It will shed a great deal of light on the current situation with Covid and why we need to fight mandates that have no scientific basis。 I studied microbiology and biochemistry in the 1980s and 1990s and read many of the original papers regarding the new field of retroviruses， pioneered by Dr。 Mikovitz's boss， Dr。 Frank Ruscetti （and others）。 The central dogma of information flow for many years was DNA-->mRNA-->protein。 Retroviruses have RNA as their genetic material （hence the "retro" part） and they have an enzyme， Reverse Transcriptase （RT） that transcribes the RNA into DNA。 Why， you may ask？ Probably because RNA is unstable。 With a stable DNA template， the virus can hijack cellular machinery to make multiple copies of the RNA and viral proteins and packaging them into new infectious particles。 However， RT is prone to making mistakes so this allows for these viruses to mutate more quickly and respond to environmental stresses to maximize survival。 Remember， a successful virus is one that can hang out in a population。 If it kills too quickly， it cannot spread far and wide。 In fact， some of the most successful viruses have actually integrated into our own cells。 Some of them are quiet。 Others are activated and can cause diseases。 Many autoimmune diseases and cancers have a viral component and it's fascinating to see how our genes interact with the environment。So what is all this corruption about？ Dr。 Mikovitz found a link between Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome （ME/CFS） and XMRV （a mouse retrovirus）。 How in the world does a mouse virus get into humans？ Via vaccines。 That's because to make a vaccine， you have to grow the viruses in cell-lines。 Whether or not we used a killed-virus vaccine or one that's attenuated to be less infectious （by passing through several generations in cell lines） you have to realize that what goes into the arm is not a pure concoction but rather a mixture containing other animal viruses， heavy metals， and other nasty things that can cause disease。 And the more you vaccinate， the more likely you might reach a tipping point that can awaken a sleeping monster。 We're used to thinking about vaccines as magic bullets。 But for certain sub-populations， these bullets end up harming the person and usually these are children。 We do not monitor their immune responses; we just take them in for shot after shot thinking we're protecting them from deadly diseases。 But consider what an immature immune system is being presented with: multiple pathogens that challenge the immune system and some of these children's immune systems get so thoroughly out of balance， they end up with auto-immune diseases。 There's also a link to mitochondrial dysfunction （mitochondria are the powerhouses of the cell） with ME/CFS and autism。 During the early days of HIV/AIDS we asked so many questions。 Some were answered， some not， but it was an exciting time。 It is Dr。 Mikovitz's work that commuted AIDS from a death sentence to one that's managed with multi-drug therapy。 However， in my naivete， it did not occur to me that some things would be kept from being published。 I always believed in the free exchange of ideas--that's why we pursue science--so I feel the same way Dr。 Mikovitz feels， the outrage of not examining more closely what we know when new information comes to light。 We have to shift our practices if we discover that we are actually harming some people。 But there's a lot at stake--pride and money--and even the best of us can be corrupted。 And Dr。 Mikovitz uncovers a great deal of it。 And guess， who's mixed up in all this？ Dr。 Fauxi。 I've had to rethink everything I know about infection and immunology in light of retroviruses and quiescent ones in our own DNA， how they could get activated。 I too have observed an explosion of people with chronic ailments and allergies （I'm one of them with chronic migraines）。 Although I have always believed that vaccinations have saved lives （and even participated in a Phase III trial for Hepatitis B vaccine） I'm not sure whether people have been able to separate the effects of vaccines vs。 those of good sanitation and hygiene。 But increasingly， I am concerned that we might be doing more harm by having so many vaccinations。 With my own children， I followed the regular protocol， declining the ones I thought weren't necessary because I kept my children at home until they were old enough for school。 Thank God they didn't face any adverse reactions but I truly feel terrible for the parents whose children were harmed。 I wonder if there's a schedule of vaccinations that minimizes damage。I find Plague of Corruption credible。 I believe the science and the documents Dr。 Mikovitz has shared。 She has great passion and I respect people who are willing to suffer for the truth。 May we all be so courageous。 。。。more

Susan Misey ，

Insight into Big Government's incestuous relationship with Big Pharma as well as the process of developing and promoting vaccines on our precious children。 Big Pharma can act with absolute impunity。 This book tells the how， why， wherefore， as well as Fauci's role in it all。 Eye opening。 Insight into Big Government's incestuous relationship with Big Pharma as well as the process of developing and promoting vaccines on our precious children。 Big Pharma can act with absolute impunity。 This book tells the how， why， wherefore， as well as Fauci's role in it all。 Eye opening。 。。。more

Michal Szajnecki ，

Pseudonaukowe fakty， opisy wyrwane z kontekstu i niedomówienia。 Książka napisana jest językiem naukowym tak， by czytający miał obraz poważnej lektury。 Niestety fakty w niej opisane są niedomówieniami i często kłamstwami。 Kilkukrotnie sprawdzałem przedstawione w niej informacje i zawsze okazywało się， że książka wprowadza nas w błąd。Nie kupować i omijać z daleka。 Jeśli ktoś używa tej książki do poparcia swoich tez， to po prostu kłamie。

Jorge Mendoza ，

Magnificient sample of what's going on at all areas of industry and goverments in relation to control people in the world by hiding scientific discoveriesThis book B Judy not only describes in detail how science is controlled and how it affects great minds in their jurney， but also provides great insights to us working in the field of helping people on potential treatment for those suffering due to vaxine- induced illnesses Magnificient sample of what's going on at all areas of industry and goverments in relation to control people in the world by hiding scientific discoveriesThis book B Judy not only describes in detail how science is controlled and how it affects great minds in their jurney， but also provides great insights to us working in the field of helping people on potential treatment for those suffering due to vaxine- induced illnesses 。。。more

John D。 Sites， Jr ，

Must read for everyone The claims in this book are alarming and demand investigation of the facts， those in authority， the destruction of data， and the alleged impact on humanity。

Rachel ，

A look at the issues of science todayAn eye opening book on the corruption in medical science today。 This is an important book， especially in these times and the fraud going on in medical community The lure of power and money and dealing with PHARMA is so rampant Good book to look at problems of today。

Joseph Cardoza ，

Complete fiction。 Don't bother。 Complete fiction。 Don't bother。 。。。more

Lori ，

I pray that Dr Judy and Frank's discoveries and concerns are reviewed further。 They deserve to have their findings to be taken seriously and continued。 The American people deserve it and for that matter the rest of the world。 It's a shame that everything becomes about money and politics。 May justice be served here。 If there are corrupt bureaucrats holding back potential truths and studies that could greatly benefit humanity then I hope that these people and organizations have a come to Jesus mom I pray that Dr Judy and Frank's discoveries and concerns are reviewed further。 They deserve to have their findings to be taken seriously and continued。 The American people deserve it and for that matter the rest of the world。 It's a shame that everything becomes about money and politics。 May justice be served here。 If there are corrupt bureaucrats holding back potential truths and studies that could greatly benefit humanity then I hope that these people and organizations have a come to Jesus moment and do what is right。 。。。more

Himanshu Uniyal ，

Corruption exists。 Practicing science is seeking truth。 Presence of corruption in Science may not be proven by， but is indicated by the absence of answers to some straightforward questions and specially by the intent of silencing the questioner。This books talks about some very critical questions about the risks posed by the way we practice vaccine research。 The stress on proving effectiveness today stands in the way of allaying risks and threats of unintended consequences。 Large corporate profit Corruption exists。 Practicing science is seeking truth。 Presence of corruption in Science may not be proven by， but is indicated by the absence of answers to some straightforward questions and specially by the intent of silencing the questioner。This books talks about some very critical questions about the risks posed by the way we practice vaccine research。 The stress on proving effectiveness today stands in the way of allaying risks and threats of unintended consequences。 Large corporate profits and expensive research expenditures getting wiped out poses this risk。 Scientific research principles， the philosophy of the "larger good"， freedom to scientific pursuits， human rights to healthy life， animal rights activism， equitable justice - all noble pursuits mix up to create lot of uncomfortable questions and confrontations which we do not have answers to today。 Is it impossible to arrive at an all acceptable solution？ Is the solution a compromise to some of these values？ Are we compromising the uncompromisable？ There seems to be no easy answer but some answers are straightforward。 。。。more

Neil J。 ，

There are no wordsThere are no words to describe the atrocities listed in this book。 Something must be done for the sake of Humanity。

Daniel Williams ，

In this text， the authors aim is to demonstrate that the blood supply and vaccines have been contaminated by retroviruses， and that is the main cause of many inflammatory related diseases including autism。 The second aim is to demonstrate that the pharmaceutical companies and government are covering this up。 The main defense for the first is Dr。 Mikovits' own work which， before "retracted" was peer reviewed and published。 And if you believe her， she is the idealistic scientist， careful in data r In this text， the authors aim is to demonstrate that the blood supply and vaccines have been contaminated by retroviruses， and that is the main cause of many inflammatory related diseases including autism。 The second aim is to demonstrate that the pharmaceutical companies and government are covering this up。 The main defense for the first is Dr。 Mikovits' own work which， before "retracted" was peer reviewed and published。 And if you believe her， she is the idealistic scientist， careful in data recording， never to overinterpret the results， never to try to have the results fit a preconceived idea。 Perfect！ As a fellow PhD scientist， I have the same view。 And from just reading her data， and the data from others she cites in support， her case looks excellent。 But a complete review would require reviewing what she would call the "cover up" data， which is a different project。 Taken alone， her case is strong！ But as I tell me scientific literacy students， look at the whole picture and sample numbers。The second aim again based in the stories seems real。 But again， the same warnings of point of view and sample numbers。 Based in my experience， of knowing researchers in other fields who suddenly and mysterious died， I sense truth。 Based in my personal experience as a researcher too， I have seen such underhanded stealing of ideas and other what is taught to us an unethical behavior。 But I add only one sample to the numbers， and much less serious case。Bottom line: real， potentially scary。 As scary as she says？ Maybe。 Exaggerated due to her bitterness？ Probably。 Truthful？ Makes to much sense to be at least partly if not totally scientifically accurate。In science I was always taught the simplest explanation is likely the correct one。 Her explanation for the immune problems and such is the simplest with this retrovirus explanation。 （Look at the AIDS story for example of how complex that one is！！！）。 That is why I keep returning too she is at least partly if not totally scientifically accurate。 。。。more

Jennifer Haug ，

I'm aware of the criticism surrounding Dr。 Mikovits and this book and I will seek out contradictory research/books that refute her claims。 I may not 100% understand the science presented in this book， but I have a good grasp of the concepts。Do I believe everything she presented here？ Maybe or maybe not。 But I will say， given how much corruption within the medical， scientific， political， and pharmaceutical industries is obvious - I'm inclined to believe the person who's vilified for bringing more I'm aware of the criticism surrounding Dr。 Mikovits and this book and I will seek out contradictory research/books that refute her claims。 I may not 100% understand the science presented in this book， but I have a good grasp of the concepts。Do I believe everything she presented here？ Maybe or maybe not。 But I will say， given how much corruption within the medical， scientific， political， and pharmaceutical industries is obvious - I'm inclined to believe the person who's vilified for bringing more into the light。 It's not hard to reach the conclusion of widespread corruption that exists back from the inception of these industries - take John D。 Rockefeller's history with oil & pharma。 With pharma being the #1 biggest lobby group in Washington D。C。 and all the efforts done to protect them （not only laws that prohibit pharma from being held liable but also the current censorship by big tech）， the corruption is obvious。The writing of this book is not the best。 My complaint on the writing style is the constant jumping between anecdotes， facts + evidence， to legal documents。 But she does explain that her co-author Ken Heckenlively （a lawyer） likes to provide complete legal documents。 Because of the distinctly different writing styles， many facts are repeated ad nauseam。 I'll end this review by saying those who've spent the past year saying they "believe science" or "trust science" with no further discussion are surely the people who will dislike this book。 It isn't easy to read things that refute your beliefs。 But as the facts of this book and scientific research is laid out for more testing and drawing your own conclusions， those who write it off based on her "reputation" or believing the mainstream narrative on the topics are more of a 'science cultist' than anything else。 Science evolves （like the new evidence on environmental toxins and pesticides）。 Science can be bought （like doctors promoting cigarettes or the FDA approving and later reversing that decision in many products）。 Science is never settled。 。。。more

Nancy Vachon ，

This book was a real eye opener about science。 Although most of the actual science language was over my head， the corrupt scientists came through loud and clear。 Judy is brave to speak up because it's not popular even when it's the right thing to do。 Talking about vaccines is dangerous， and she explained the danger in them and how much money is made for the manufacturers。This excerpt really spoke to me， "If vaccines are safe， why do the pharmaceutical companies have complete financial immunity a This book was a real eye opener about science。 Although most of the actual science language was over my head， the corrupt scientists came through loud and clear。 Judy is brave to speak up because it's not popular even when it's the right thing to do。 Talking about vaccines is dangerous， and she explained the danger in them and how much money is made for the manufacturers。This excerpt really spoke to me， "If vaccines are safe， why do the pharmaceutical companies have complete financial immunity and are protected by a battalion of lawyers from the US Dept。 of Justice？ Pharmaceutical companies are the largest contributors to the U。S。 Congress and have more lobbyists than our Congressmen and Senators combined。 That means they control the federal agencies which is exactly what our constitution with it's series of checks and balances was designed to prevent。 The pharmaceutical companies also bribe the media with massive advertising buys and are a huge contributor to medical schools as well。" 。。。more

Mika Auramo ，

Judy Mikovitsin ja Kent Heckenlivelyn mielenkiintoisesti kirjoittama korruptoitunutta rokotebisnestä läpivalaiseva teos keskittyy rokotteiden haittavaikutuksiin ja varsinkin retrovirusten aiheuttamiin autoimmuunisairauksiin。 Väitteet ovat kovia tieteen turmelemisesta jättifirmojen etujen vuoksi ja kansalaisten terveyden pilaamisesta monenlaisin piikityskampanjoin， jotka ovat aiheuttaneet epidemian varsinkin neuroimmuunisairausten leviämisessä。Kahteentoista lukuun jaoteltu kokonaisuus alkaa Rober Judy Mikovitsin ja Kent Heckenlivelyn mielenkiintoisesti kirjoittama korruptoitunutta rokotebisnestä läpivalaiseva teos keskittyy rokotteiden haittavaikutuksiin ja varsinkin retrovirusten aiheuttamiin autoimmuunisairauksiin。 Väitteet ovat kovia tieteen turmelemisesta jättifirmojen etujen vuoksi ja kansalaisten terveyden pilaamisesta monenlaisin piikityskampanjoin， jotka ovat aiheuttaneet epidemian varsinkin neuroimmuunisairausten leviämisessä。Kahteentoista lukuun jaoteltu kokonaisuus alkaa Robert F。 Kennedyn esipuheella， jossa nostetaan esille monikansalliset lääkefirmat， jotka ovat Kennedyn mukaan korruptoituneiden hallitusten ohella johtava voima niin tieteessä kuin politiikassakin。 Tehdään myös pieni katsaus epäkohtien paljastajiin， ja alkuun lähdetään Ignaz Semmelweisista， joka yritti saada sairaalakuolleisuutta vähenemään ja lääkärit pesemään käsiään Wienissä 1800-luvulla。 No， tohtori passitettiin hullujenhuoneelle， jossa hän pian mystisesti kuolikin。 Samankaltaisia tapauksia nostetaan lukuisia esille， ja tähän narratiiviin kuuluu， että epäkohtien ja väärinkäytösten paljastajat lynkataan tieteellisessä yhteisössä ja heidän maineensa loataan pysyvästi。 Esim。 1940-luvulla muuan Alice Stewart yritti turhaan vakuutella röntgenkuvausten vaaroista raskaana oleville ja syntymättömien lasten mahdollisista sikiövaurioista。 Oma lukunsa on surullisen kuuluisa poliorokotuskampanja Jenkeissä， kun pistokset aiheuttivatkin enemmän lapsihalvausta kuin saatiin estettyä， ja Bearnice Eddyn varoituksista huolimatta syöpää aiheuttavaa apinavirusta （SV40） piikitettiin noin sata miljoonaa annosta。Tutkijakaksikko Mikovitsin ja Frank Ruscettin tutkima XMRV-virus （xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus） vaikuttaisi aiheuttavan monia sairauksia kuten leukemiaa， eturauhassyöpää， Alzheimerin tautia ja lukuisan määrän autoimmuunisairauksia。 Ensimmäinen syöpää aiheuttava retrovirus （HTLV-1 eli Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus） löydettiin jo vuonna 1980 （Ruscettin tiimi， myös Bernie Boiesz）。 Edelleen lääketieteessä kiistellään， onko edes tällaisia retroviruksia olemassa， ja lukuisa määrä tutkimuksia on mitätöity， sillä romuttaahan sellainen vanhat uskomukset。 Näiden edellä mainittujen virusten eristäminen on hankalaa， sillä ne piiloutuvat kudoksiin ja ne löytyvät verestä vasta kun immuunipuolustus on jo romahtanut。 Näitä Mikovits tutki ansiokkaasti vuosikymmeniä， kunnes joutui tiedeyhteisön ja viranomaisten maalittamaksi hylkiöksi。Näiden retrovirusten aiheuttajia ovat saastuneista eläinsoluviljelmistä （ksenotransplantaatio） peräisin olevat rokotteiden patogeenit– eihän kukaan ei voi varmuudella tietää， millaisia taudinaiheuttajia ja viruksia tällöin ruiskutetaan kohdehenkilöihin。 Retroviruksilla tarkoitetaan RNA-viruksia， jotka integroituvat DNA-pohjaisiksi organismeiksi ja pysyvät piilossa metylaation vuoksi。 Mikovits pitääkin HIV-virusta poikkeuksellisena retroviruksena， sillä se saattoi tappaa kantajansa muutamassa vuodessa， toisin kuin XMRV-virusten isännät voivat huonosti， menettävät terveytensä， mutta sinnittelevät joten kuten hengissä。Tutkimusten mukaan varsinkin rokotteissa käytetyt saastuneet eläinperäiset kudokset voivat aiheuttaa sairauksia。 Mikovits nostaa esille myös kirjainyhdistelmät CFS/ME， ja ensin mainittu tarkoittaa kroonista väsymysoireyhtymää ja jälkimmäinen aivojen ja selkäytimen tulehdusta。 Kroonisen väsymykseen liittyy usein MS-taudin piirteitä， kuten puhe- ja liikkumisvaikeuksia， sumuista ajattelua ja oksidatiivisen stressin oireita。 Mikovitsin ja Ruscettin työryhmä kertoo löytäneensä noin kahdelta kolmasosalta CFS/ME-oireryhmiin sairastuneita rokotteista peräisin olevia retroviruksia， ja samanlaisia löydöksiä he ovat tehneet autismidiagnoosiin saaneista。 Erilaisilla tehosteaineilla ja hermomyrkyillä pyritään saamaan immuunipuolustusjärjestelmä reagoimaan rokotteisiin。 Näistä nimetään mm。 elohopea， alumiini， formaldehydi， polysorbaatti 80 ja monet muut。Muutamissa luvuissa Mikovits kertoo häneen kohdistuneesta ajojahdista， FBI:n， DEA:n ja FDA:n toiminnasta ja julkisista parjauskampanjoista ja monista kohtalotovereistaan kuin salaliittoteorioita käsittelevissä toimintaleffoissa。 Kaikki alkoi siitä， kun aiemmin mainittu tutkijakaksikko onnistui työryhmineen eristämän ensi kertaa XMRV-retroviruksen vuonna 2010， ja läpimurrosta julkaistiinkin mm。 Science-lehdessä。 Mukaan saadaan salaperäisiä kuolemantapauksia， joista mainittakoon Teh-Jeang-niminen alansa huippututkija， joka toimi aikansa Anthony Faucin kakkosmiehenä。 Myös brittilääkäri Andrew Wakefieldin tutkimustulokset MMR-rokotteiden ja autismin välisestä löydöksestä ja sen jälkeisistä tapahtumista kerrataan myös lyhyesti。 Näissähän tavattiin käyttää heikennettyjä viruksia ja apinoiden munuaissoluja， marsujen soluviljelmiä ja naudan seerumia。 Esitetäänpä Edward Hooperin tutkimuksia HIV-Aids-epidemiasta， ja jäljet vaikuttavaisivat johtavan simpanssikudoksessa kasvatettuun poliorokotteeseen。 Mikovits väittää rokotteiden tuottavan uusia virusmutaatioita sekoittaessaan ja vaurioittaessaan ihmisten luontaista immuunipuolustusjärjestelmää ja altistavan vakaville virustaudeille kuten Ebolalle， HIV:lle ja Zikalle。Muutamia sitaatteja: – Biologia ei välttämättä seuraa teknologiaa。– Jokainen rokotuskerta lisää haittojen todennäköisyyttä。– Retrovirukset （XMRV ja VP62） voivat levitä aerosolitartuntana。– Retrovirukset tykkäävät hengailla ruoansulatuskanavassa， sillä siellähän on enin osa immuunipuolustusjärjestelmästä muutenkin。 。。。more

Lucy Kenyon ，

I read about a third of this book and I don’t know what to make of Mikovits。 She doesn’t present her case well， and if I didn’t already think there’s something seriously wrong at the CDC and the NIH， I’d be inclined to doubt her。 She doesn’t project the image of an objective scientist that’s necessary to get the reader’s trust; she’s overly emotional， scattered， and seems to be leaving out important details that would help the reader arrive at the same conclusions she’s presenting。 There’s a lot I read about a third of this book and I don’t know what to make of Mikovits。 She doesn’t present her case well， and if I didn’t already think there’s something seriously wrong at the CDC and the NIH， I’d be inclined to doubt her。 She doesn’t project the image of an objective scientist that’s necessary to get the reader’s trust; she’s overly emotional， scattered， and seems to be leaving out important details that would help the reader arrive at the same conclusions she’s presenting。 There’s a lot of conjecture， too。 At one point she suggests that Fauci may have had a subordinate murdered， because just maybe the two of them had an argument， and the supposed argument may have concerned the XMRV virus， and Fauci may have been disturbed because the subordinate may have been starting to agree with Mikovits and become a threat to Fauci。 A responsible writer doesn’t say things like that， no matter what she thinks could have happened。 Such comments make me wonder about her integrity as a researcher。 Everything she says about vaccines being contaminated with MXRV could be right on， but with this book she might have become her own worst enemy。 。。。more

Katie ，

She compared herself to Martin Luther King。。。 😳

Derrick Rancourt ，

Got weird at the end。

Reference

google book https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Pandemia klamstw. Szokujaca prawda o skorumpowanym swiecie nauki i epidemiach, ktorych moglismy uniknac

hathitrust digital library https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ls?q1=Pandemia klamstw. Szokujaca prawda o skorumpowanym swiecie nauki i epidemiach, ktorych moglismy uniknac&field1=ocr&a=srchls&ft=ft&lmt=ft

The British Library https://bll01.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,Pandemia klamstw. Szokujaca prawda o skorumpowanym swiecie nauki i epidemiach, ktorych moglismy uniknac&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=Not_BL_Suppress&vid=44BL_INST:BLL01&lang=en&offset=0