Psychology

Mapy Sensu: Architektura Przekonań

Mapy Sensu: Architektura Przekonań

  • Downloads：3556
  • Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date：2021-09-17 09:53:23
  • Update Date：2025-09-07
  • Status：finish
  • Author：Jordan B. Peterson
  • ISBN：8396049807
  • Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
  • Download

Summary

Dlaczego ludy różnych czasów i miejsc formułowały mity i opowieści o podobnej symbolice i przesłaniu？ Czy społeczności ludzkie o odmiennych przekonaniach religijnych lub ideologicznych skazane są na wieczny konflikt？ Czy naukowe twierdzenia i religijne dogmaty rzeczywiście muszą pozostać względem siebie w wiecznej sprzeczności？ Czy możliwe jest osłabienie skłonności jednostki do dokonywania okrucieństw motywowanych poczuciem tożsamości grupowej？ Jaki sposób życia daje największe szanse wypełnienia go poczuciem sensu i znaczenia？

W Mapach sensu Jordan B。 Peterson próbuje odpowiedzieć na te pytania， stawiając nową， śmiałą hipotezę， wskazującą na związek między ustaleniami współczesnej neuropsychologii a strukturą najstarszych opowieści religijnych i mitów （jak na przykład mity sumeryjskie i egipskie） oraz alchemią。 Autor czerpie też z dzieł największych mistrzów pióra takich jak Lew Tołstoj czy Aleksander Sołżenicyn， odnajdując na kartach ich powieści literackie obrazy ilustrujące jego teorię。 Napisana z imponującym rozmachem interdyscyplinarna odyseja Petersona sięga od przesłania prastarych wierzeń， przez odkrycia nauk kognitywnych， po Jungowskie analizy mitologii i narracji。

Ta książka to fascynująca synteza myśli archaicznej ze współczesną， a zarazem pasjonujący wgląd w źródła ludzkiej motywacji oraz sposób postrzegania świata przez człowieka różnych epok。 To niezwykle wnikliwy i momentami wręcz bolesny obraz dynamiki pomiędzy siłami porządku a chaosu， zarówno na poziomie indywidualnej psychiki， jak i na płaszczyźnie całych społeczeństw。 Podążając szlakami tych "map sensu" stopniowo odkrywamy tajemnicę， niemalże receptę na odnalezienie upragnionej równowagi pomiędzy tym， co nieokiełznane i zagrażające a tym， co nadmiernie stabilne i dławione strukturą – jej wyznacznikiem jest los Bohatera， odkrywcy i eksploratora， zdolnego rozpoznać skostniały porządek， zanurzyć się z powrotem w chaos， a następnie budować na nowych fundamentach。 Według Autora identyfikacja z taką postawą czyni świat lepszym， a towarzyszące życiu tragedie bardziej zrozumiałymi i dzięki temu łatwiejszymi do zniesienia。

Download

Reviews

Francis Bezooyen ，

I didn't find Jordan's book， "12 rules for life"， all that revolutionary， and I have some objections to some of the conclusions he comes to on the basis of what he has written here as found in his interviews and debates， but this book was truly fascinating to me and， despite a somewhat boring start， a great deal of unnecessary repetition and， arguably， overly technical language （which is actually comprehensible if you really follow it）， entirely worth the read。 In fact， I'm planning to dedicate I didn't find Jordan's book， "12 rules for life"， all that revolutionary， and I have some objections to some of the conclusions he comes to on the basis of what he has written here as found in his interviews and debates， but this book was truly fascinating to me and， despite a somewhat boring start， a great deal of unnecessary repetition and， arguably， overly technical language （which is actually comprehensible if you really follow it）， entirely worth the read。 In fact， I'm planning to dedicate a substantial amount of time to reviewing my highlights and attempting to summarize， criticize， and build on the ideas here in my own writing。 There is so much here that deserves prolonged consideration and that engages my own thoughts and experiences in interesting ways。 。。。more

Kostas Kiousis ，

Difficult to follow， and perhaps it could be at least 1/3 shorter without losing much of its meaning， but the treasure awaiting the one to accept the mental challenge of reading this book from start to end is beyond belief and description。 This man， J。 Peterson is one of the most valuable minds and personalities in the world today。 I'm only grateful and humbled to have had the privilege to read his three main books [the other two are "12 Rules for Life" and "Beyond Order"]。In this book， which pr Difficult to follow， and perhaps it could be at least 1/3 shorter without losing much of its meaning， but the treasure awaiting the one to accept the mental challenge of reading this book from start to end is beyond belief and description。 This man， J。 Peterson is one of the most valuable minds and personalities in the world today。 I'm only grateful and humbled to have had the privilege to read his three main books [the other two are "12 Rules for Life" and "Beyond Order"]。In this book， which precedes the other two， he begins the journey [at least for me]， to explore the boundaries between Chaos and Order and deep dive into their still unchartered territories。 He ventures to discover the roots and the mechanisms of Good and Evil， with aid of ancient myths， religions， and modern psychology。I have said it before: his books should be mandatory for all levels of education [though there should be revised "lighter" versions for kids and those of us not mentally strong]。Honestly， I will leave his books to my children as an invaluable heritage of the human spirit！ 。。。more

Nikola Todorić ，

Jung， Eliade， Nietzsche， Dostoevsky， Solzhenitsyn， Piaget and a little bit of real science and research。However， the structure is not bad and the book is not boring， so the overall impression is predominantly positive。

c ，

Book Big。 Thinks Big。 Rating Good。 Lectures better。

Reid Brooks ，

I really like Jordan Peterson。 I’ve been extremely disappointed with his writing。 There doesn’t appear to be a clear goal to his writing。 It’s most accurately described as self-indulgent philosophical musings。 At times I almost expected him to climb out of the book at whisper in my ear “do you see how smart I am？” And the answer is no， Jordan， I do not。I like him in general because I think he does a good job of cutting through BS and getting to logical points quickly。 This book is largely the op I really like Jordan Peterson。 I’ve been extremely disappointed with his writing。 There doesn’t appear to be a clear goal to his writing。 It’s most accurately described as self-indulgent philosophical musings。 At times I almost expected him to climb out of the book at whisper in my ear “do you see how smart I am？” And the answer is no， Jordan， I do not。I like him in general because I think he does a good job of cutting through BS and getting to logical points quickly。 This book is largely the opposite。 It’s just a lot of talking without any clear purpose。 Thankfully， his musings are not in any way “bad”， they just aren’t so compelling as to warrant reading a relatively long book of personal thoughts。There are better books in the genre， and much better books to take one’s limited reading time。My apologies to Jordan—I wish he wrote like he debates。 。。。more

Samuel ，

This has to have been the most difficult book I have read to date。 I am so glad to have toiled through it however， having reached the conclusion which to me was icing on the cake in the proverbial sense。

Axza ，

Stupid

Marius CEO ，

A remarkable piece of literature that will undoutably stand the test of time and be read and reread in the decades to come。

David ，

Read as much as I could。 Significant thinking going on but the writing is verbose。 Needs an editor。 Overall， worth engaging but the reality is that there are other books to read。

Ignas Špokas ，

I would say that book was very informative and deep。 Help to understand the meaning of chaos and how myths and stories show us how to deal with the chaos。 It helped me a lot to understand deeper the choices that each of us makes and to understand the implication of stories that we hear， know and tell。 Sometimes was a little too hard to fallow but it was amazing book。

Rudi Pauwelijn ，

Ik zou 5 sterren geven voor de inspanningen van de schrijver ， maar er is iets met de woorden wat het voor mij moeilijker leesbaar maakt （ met een boek van Nietzsche had ik het ook ） ， wilskracht， voelskracht， denkkracht ， dan zit er mss een beetje teveel denkkracht in om het voor mij duidelijk te houden ， Goed boek dat mij bij momenten stevig deed nadenken ， het nieuwe testament komt uit het oude testament 。。。 。enz

Darjeeling ，

I had to re-start it a few times， and a lot of it still went over my head。 It's a bit above my reading level， and I will probably come back to it a few times。 The more times I re-read it the more I understand。 Petersons other books are far easier， and I definitely recommend reading them first。 It seems to be a history of our beliefs and cultures， but with a focus on western belief and culture， it's function， why we have it at all and how it came to be。 I think books like this need to be written， I had to re-start it a few times， and a lot of it still went over my head。 It's a bit above my reading level， and I will probably come back to it a few times。 The more times I re-read it the more I understand。 Petersons other books are far easier， and I definitely recommend reading them first。 It seems to be a history of our beliefs and cultures， but with a focus on western belief and culture， it's function， why we have it at all and how it came to be。 I think books like this need to be written， but I hope that it's possible to find clearer ways of doing it， since this is a very dense and difficult book。 。。。more

Brenden ，

Unfinished - The material here is too dense for a dummy like me。

Nate Lorenzen ，

This is a book you just have to expect to only understand about 10% of it from the first pass。 Let it wash over you。 It is drinking from a fire hydrant。It is dense。 It is impossible to recommend。 The audio experience was a pleasurable listen。I took a lot from this book。 The hero provides unending nourishment。I would say despite my rating that it’d be helpful if this was split into 3 or 4 volumesOn heroismOn evilOn alchemySelected ReadingsThis is the font of Jordan Peterson。 All his other works d This is a book you just have to expect to only understand about 10% of it from the first pass。 Let it wash over you。 It is drinking from a fire hydrant。It is dense。 It is impossible to recommend。 The audio experience was a pleasurable listen。I took a lot from this book。 The hero provides unending nourishment。I would say despite my rating that it’d be helpful if this was split into 3 or 4 volumesOn heroismOn evilOn alchemySelected ReadingsThis is the font of Jordan Peterson。 All his other works derive from this book。 I also always find it interesting to read what an intellectual spends years of his life on。 。。。more

Curious reader ，

It is very dense but if you listen to the audiobook version， read by himself， you can hear perfectly clearly that this is far from obfuscation。 Watching the lectures for this class before reading the book helped a lot as well。 Also the people that say he misconstrues Gödel's theorem might not understand the context in which this point is made。 The point is that no matter how much information you have at your disposal you are still limited by an inexorable ignorance， even if you're a mathematicia It is very dense but if you listen to the audiobook version， read by himself， you can hear perfectly clearly that this is far from obfuscation。 Watching the lectures for this class before reading the book helped a lot as well。 Also the people that say he misconstrues Gödel's theorem might not understand the context in which this point is made。 The point is that no matter how much information you have at your disposal you are still limited by an inexorable ignorance， even if you're a mathematician。 It's the same reason he brings up the uncertainty principle in physics。 My degree is in physics， not psychology， and I personally find this repeated point of contention trivial -- it is worth mentioning mathematicians are notoriously picky about wording， even though they use capital lambda and wedge as one character， Λ， in very slightly different sizes in their advanced linear algebras for very， very different concepts， so they're not perfectly clear in their expressions either and drive other people crazy as much as Jordan might drive them by his references to Gödel。 It could also be politically motivated because he makes exactly the same point as the Numberphile videos on it but nobody seems to be as perturbed about it over there。That being said I am not sure if this book can be read at all without a lot of experience reading technical material。 It can be studied slowly but surely， however， as I believe is intended （he takes a semester to go through it and doesn't go through every single detail， after all）。 The audiobook is way， way easier to understand and it's about 33 hours long。 Going through that made the physical text a lot more digestible。 All things considered I think this could go down as an analogue to The Origin of the Species of our time。 。。。more

Ariel Trees ，

Had to read it， talks about the same Perennial Philosophy I love。 It’s much more enjoyable than his other works actually because he doesn’t instill his conservative editorializing to the same degree。 I also really want to read Gulag Archipelago now which I had barely heard of previously。

Alex Whigham ，

Took me about three months to make my way through this beast of a book。 Glad i did！ Lots of insight and thought into religion that was new to me。 The analysis of the positive and negative aspects of chaos and order were very enlightening and i think give applicable advice to the life of the reader in terms of informing them that meaning in life if found in mediating between the two， that is chaos and order。

John Amador ，

Reflection Upon Interpretations of BeingThis book is a wide ranging exploration of the mental models of meaning that we employ to apprehend， reflect and direct our thinking that informs all our actions。 The author takes us on a mental journey through the dominant mythological， religious and philosophical systems throughout history and contemporary times inclusive of their psychological and sociological implications as regards their function in aiding us in navigating the course of life。

Daniel ，

A bit dense but helps explain much of JBP's thought and belief system。 A bit dense but helps explain much of JBP's thought and belief system。 。。。more

Jake Griess ，

Wow。 What an amazing work of academia。 This book was really difficult to get through， especially the first half。 The final third of the book was particularly good but overall， this book has fundamentally tweaked the way in which I see the world and myself。 The man is truly a genius doing incredible work for the world and yet is castigated by mainstream media who truly don't even know what he is communicating。 Read this book if you can and you will be better for it。 Wow。 What an amazing work of academia。 This book was really difficult to get through， especially the first half。 The final third of the book was particularly good but overall， this book has fundamentally tweaked the way in which I see the world and myself。 The man is truly a genius doing incredible work for the world and yet is castigated by mainstream media who truly don't even know what he is communicating。 Read this book if you can and you will be better for it。 。。。more

Tim Ver ，

Dense books don't always make important ones。 Dense books don't always make important ones。 。。。more

PhysicalMountain ，

This is the closest thing to the 'Truth' ever written since the beginning of written literature （3400 B。C。）"I have told you these things， so that in me you may have peace。 In this world， you will have trouble。 But take heart！ I have overcome the world。 John 16:33" This is the closest thing to the 'Truth' ever written since the beginning of written literature （3400 B。C。）"I have told you these things， so that in me you may have peace。 In this world， you will have trouble。 But take heart！ I have overcome the world。 John 16:33" 。。。more

Tom Schulte ，

Sometimes called a "rightwing professor"， Canadian psychology professor and culture warrior Jordan B。 Peterson intrigued with his quip that the typical person now would be a Nazi back in Hitler's Germany。 This seems to have somewhat endeared him to neo-Nazis。 Then， I saw the documentary The Rise of Jordan Peterson where he hectically went around between fawning admirers， event issues， and debating pronouns awkwardly。 So， I thought I would read his magnum opus and be my own judge。 I appreciate th Sometimes called a "rightwing professor"， Canadian psychology professor and culture warrior Jordan B。 Peterson intrigued with his quip that the typical person now would be a Nazi back in Hitler's Germany。 This seems to have somewhat endeared him to neo-Nazis。 Then， I saw the documentary The Rise of Jordan Peterson where he hectically went around between fawning admirers， event issues， and debating pronouns awkwardly。 So， I thought I would read his magnum opus and be my own judge。 I appreciate the years （decades？） put into this while finding it really unimpressive and lacking in insight。 The oft-referred to images for the work strike me as crude and unimpressive。 The work itself is a clothes to which is clipped Viktor Frankl， Friedrich Nietzsche， Hannah Arendt， and others with connecting lines of mythology， dreams， Christology， etc。 Really， it feels listening to blather while a joint is passed around on a couch by community college students sharing a 100-level philosophy course。 The most intriguing， original content to me is the childrens' dreams from his family and cases tied into the framework of a main inspiration C。G。 Jung/ I'd really like to see him approach this subject broadly and produce something in between Jung and E。M。 Butler。 。。。more

Semere ，

A metanalysis of belief， religion， and meaning。 An insightful way of looking at the world。

Lorrie ，

I love JP。。 yet， I was very reluctant to read this book as it is （or so I thought） about religion。 However， I was pleasantly surprised to find out it's actually about so much more。 The ideas he discusses can be applied to all parts of life and will actually give you some perspective on your own psyche and what possibly motivates you。 It's also great to understand how some things came to be out of the original meaning when first instituted and how as times changed， meaning changed。 He also discus I love JP。。 yet， I was very reluctant to read this book as it is （or so I thought） about religion。 However， I was pleasantly surprised to find out it's actually about so much more。 The ideas he discusses can be applied to all parts of life and will actually give you some perspective on your own psyche and what possibly motivates you。 It's also great to understand how some things came to be out of the original meaning when first instituted and how as times changed， meaning changed。 He also discusses how different parts of the world value different things based on lifestyle/values in that part of the world。 I actually really enjoyed this book。 。。。more

David Steele ，

Hard work， but worth the effort。 Took me a year in small chunks。

Farrukh Pitafi ，

Good book。 Reduced one star because of his other works。 Authors also matter you know。 But I could not find any fault with this one。 I'd recommend you stop after reading this one。 Good book。 Reduced one star because of his other works。 Authors also matter you know。 But I could not find any fault with this one。 I'd recommend you stop after reading this one。 。。。more

Katherine Kappelmann ，

I found this book simultaneously frustrating and saddening。 It was frustrating because it was overly long， wordy， repetitive， convoluted， and self-important （Peterson even quotes the entirety of a personal letter he wrote）。 Given the many inaccurate and misleading statements Peterson makes regarding Christianity and Christian doctrine， I question the depth of his understanding about many of the other faiths/traditions he discusses and the resulting validity of his assertions。 The book was sadden I found this book simultaneously frustrating and saddening。 It was frustrating because it was overly long， wordy， repetitive， convoluted， and self-important （Peterson even quotes the entirety of a personal letter he wrote）。 Given the many inaccurate and misleading statements Peterson makes regarding Christianity and Christian doctrine， I question the depth of his understanding about many of the other faiths/traditions he discusses and the resulting validity of his assertions。 The book was saddening because it is obvious that Peterson fundamentally misunderstands Christianity。 To reject salvation through Christ and struggle to become a "hero" purely in our own strength is not a path that will lead to meaning。 。。。more

Brandon Cook ，

Extremely interesting， very wide-ranging， and drawing in a heap of diverse thinkers and philosophers。 Anyone who's heard Peterson give a lecture knows who falls into his grab bag of influential thinkers: Dostoyevsky， Jung， Jean Piaget， Nitzsche， Solzhenitsyn。 "Maps of Meaning" is the doctor's first book and， in many ways， he's never written a second。 Twenty-odd years after its publication， Peterson is making the same claims that he made here。 Meaning is to be found in responsibility。 Responsibil Extremely interesting， very wide-ranging， and drawing in a heap of diverse thinkers and philosophers。 Anyone who's heard Peterson give a lecture knows who falls into his grab bag of influential thinkers: Dostoyevsky， Jung， Jean Piaget， Nitzsche， Solzhenitsyn。 "Maps of Meaning" is the doctor's first book and， in many ways， he's never written a second。 Twenty-odd years after its publication， Peterson is making the same claims that he made here。 Meaning is to be found in responsibility。 Responsibility and its narrative looks a lot like the Hero's Journey: the voluntary confrontation with the unknown and shouldering of the largest burden one can find。 There's nothing new the reader will find here if， like me， he's spent the past 2-odd years feeding steadily off Peterson's enormous cache of lectures and interviews。 Buy "Maps of Meaning" is still the best place to find these ideas in their most comprehensive form。 。。。more

Jonathan Honnor ，

I both love and hate Peterson。 On YouTube he is an enthralling lecturer， imbuing every moment with moral urgency and force。 This moral urgency is one of his most important lessons as a pastoral teacher: one is always moving within a hierarchy of values， one’s smallest actions may be morally significant。 Unlike some other popular academics who deal with social problems from a distant， collective position， Peterson sees social issues as solvable primarily from the individual perspective。 It is eac I both love and hate Peterson。 On YouTube he is an enthralling lecturer， imbuing every moment with moral urgency and force。 This moral urgency is one of his most important lessons as a pastoral teacher: one is always moving within a hierarchy of values， one’s smallest actions may be morally significant。 Unlike some other popular academics who deal with social problems from a distant， collective position， Peterson sees social issues as solvable primarily from the individual perspective。 It is each individual’s responsibility to act as morally and authentically as possible， else the system as a whole will collapse。Peterson’s excellent ability to sermonise is also Peterson’s weakness as a writer。 It makes him sententious rather than sensitive。 His （often long， unanalysed） excerpts from Solzhenitsyn， Dostoevsky and the Bible show that Peterson’s tendency often tends towards inculcating moral value rather than initiating critical thought。 This again makes him an excellent lecturer or preacher， but a terrible academic writer。 I have seen some think that Jung’s books are disorganised and difficult to follow because they are often lectures written down， and this criticism could be levelled at his disciple as well。 The most pleasurable way to experience Maps of Meaning may be the lecture series on YouTube。 The book， however， reads as drafts of chapters thrown together: it is not particularly systematised， it is often repetitious， and simply inserts long extracts from other books and various biographical material （including his own dreams and a letter to his parents about the book） that for me unnecessarily disrupt the book’s flow。 As an academic book， it is （surprisingly！） one of the sloppiest in terms of editing and scholarship I have yet seen。 I find it quite amusing that the supposed champion of order， telling everyone else to clean their rooms， presents himself here as quite a disorganised thinker。The ideas presented here and on Peterson’s YouTube channel however have impacted me in quite a significant way， but I should rather say ‘idea’ because Peterson only has one。 He is a ‘hedgehog’ thinker， who only knows one big thing — that being the never-ending battle between chaos and order。 Chaos is the feminine principle， order the masculine。 Chaos gives birth to order， which in turn goes out into the unknown to structure it。 This idea Peterson finds in some mythologies and religions， from Mesopotamian， to Egyptian， to Christian， to alchemical。 Each individual has the capacity to become the hero — the hero imitates Christ by travelling out into the unknown and making it known: by ‘harrowing hell’ or slaying the dragon of chaos。Some have noted the parallel with Peterson’s system of thought with Hegel （of whom Peterson himself appears strangely ignorant）。 Peterson believes that society progresses with the introduction of a chaotic element or an anomaly， that the revolutionary hero finds a way to reintegrate into the structure of the preexisting society; the anomaly is like Hegel’s negative。 Both Hegel and Peterson may therefore reach the conclusion （although less explicitly in Peterson’s case） that society tends towards a divine， paradisal state — the total manifestation of the known from the unknown， or ‘Absolute Knowing’。 Thus Peterson’s book ends with a quote from the Gospel of Thomas: ‘nothing hidden will not become manifest， and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered’。 Life is about turning chaos into order， and the ability to achieve this is limited only by the amount of chaos， or the amount of ‘prima materia’ which can be alchemically transformed into gold。The metaphysical issues with such a system are explicit （even if I have oversimplified Hegel’s and Peterson’s thought）。 For one， it posits no epistemological limits to the human subject。 In Hegel， there are no Kantian bounds to the infinitude of human knowledge; for Peterson， the hero will always be capable of killing the dragon。 Kierkegaard’s critique of Hegel therefore applies equally to Peterson: he posits God as wholly intelligible to man， whereas the parable of Abraham and Isaac shows that God’s incomprehensibility may exceed all bounds of human rationality and be accessible only through the irrational and absurd。 It undervalues the divine chaos and overvalues human rationality and order — it turns God-man into the man-God。 This therefore leads to many of Peterson’s reductive readings of Biblical texts that turn them into mere representations of human psychological processes。 It is precisely Hegel’s system that led to Feuerbach’s humanist reading of religious texts that do not seem to value the aesthetic and divine mysteries at the heart of religion。 Peterson falls into the same， overly rational and all-too-human trap。Although Peterson goes to great pains in this book to show that he values chaos as an equal to order， his system and presuppositions ultimately show an innate bias towards ordering。 In public life， he has sometimes the tendency to become the ‘Terrible/Tyrranical Father’ rather than the revolutionary hero， such as in his sometimes very conservative positions in political debates。 As order is linked with the masculine， Peterson’s thought appeals largely to men。 There is little appeal for Peterson to women because there is no real way for many women to imitate the patterns of behaviour of Peterson’s ‘revolutionary hero’。 The hero， despite supposedly synthesising chaos and order， is gendered male in all examples Peterson presents。 When charged with the criticism that he links chaos with the feminine， Peterson has replied that this is not a decision he has made， but rather one that pre-exists within religion， mythology and culture。 This is true: chaos is （archetypally） feminine。 But Peterson doesn’t seem to fully appreciate the value that chaos has for society and the individual， in the way that Iain McGilchrist appears far more to do。 Chaos is not purely to be combatted， it is also to be affirmed， as in Nietzsche’s ‘Dionysian affirmation’。 I do not think that Peterson has interpreted this aspect of Nietzsche faithfully， and as such he is more dismissive of the postmoderns than is perhaps necessary。 It also explains his distaste for modern feminism — but modern feminism too should （probably， I think） be affirmed。 Goethe’s dictum ‘Das ewig Weibliche zieht uns hinan’ remains true today。。。If one believes that so-called chaos and the unknown transcends the understanding of order， then one realises the faultiness of the dualistic model。 They are not opposites: order believes that chaos is its opposite， but rather chaos transcends mere opposition， transcends binary。 Humans are born fundamentally ignorant about the world， but they are also ignorant about how they come to know about the world。 I do not think， therefore， that Peterson’s schema of how human， ‘subjective’ meaning is created is ultimately successful。 Peterson does not accept the aesthetic （divine） mystery of myth， literature， and religion， which he turns into mere guides of ethical action。 I have compared him to Hegel， but I think Peterson is much less significant than Hegel because Hegel’s syntheses are never constrained by the dead weight of overly formalised thinking。 His dialectic is wild and confusing but liberated — a much better way of exploring the unknown。 Peterson has a somewhat compelling system， but it is ultimately a far too limited monomyth。 ‘There are more things in heaven and earth， Hedgehog， than are dreamt of in your philosophy’。 。。。more

Reference

google book https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Mapy Sensu: Architektura Przekonań

hathitrust digital library https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ls?q1=Mapy Sensu: Architektura Przekonań&field1=ocr&a=srchls&ft=ft&lmt=ft

The British Library https://bll01.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,Mapy Sensu: Architektura Przekonań&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=Not_BL_Suppress&vid=44BL_INST:BLL01&lang=en&offset=0