Scepticism: A Very Short Introduction

Scepticism: A Very Short Introduction

  • Downloads:2294
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-07-30 09:55:04
  • Update Date:2025-09-07
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Duncan Pritchard
  • ISBN:0198829167
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Throughout history scepticism and the urge to question accepted truths has been a powerful force for change and growth。 Today, as we are bombarded by adverts, scientific studies praising the latest superfoods, and political rhetoric, a healthy amount of scepticism is widely encouraged。 But when is such scepticism legitimate - for example, as a driver of new ideas - and when is it problematic? And what role might adopting a sceptical outlook play in leading an intellectually virtuous life?

In this Very Short Introduction Duncan Pritchard explores both the advantages of scepticism, in challenging outdated notions, and also how it can have unhelpful social consequences, in generating distrust。 He considers the role of scepticism at the source of contemporary social and political movements such as climate change denial, post-truth politics, and fake news。 Pritchard also examines the philosophical arguments for a radical form of scepticism which maintains that knowledge is impossible, and explores some of the main responses to these arguments。 Finally, he considers the part scepticism might play in applying better thinking and learning to achieve a more meaningful life。

ABOUT THE SERIES: The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area。 These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly。 Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable。

Download

Reviews

Steve Birchmore

I bought this after spending a day working with someone where we passed the time talking about covid-19, conspiracy theories and suchlike。 I mentioned to my colleague an incident that happened nearly 20 years ago。 I told him I've practiced meditation for nearly 30 years and I sometimes go to group meditations as they seem to give some extra depth or something to the meditation。 30 years ago, I was suffering pretty badly from stress and I found meditation (and some other things) to be, to my surp I bought this after spending a day working with someone where we passed the time talking about covid-19, conspiracy theories and suchlike。 I mentioned to my colleague an incident that happened nearly 20 years ago。 I told him I've practiced meditation for nearly 30 years and I sometimes go to group meditations as they seem to give some extra depth or something to the meditation。 30 years ago, I was suffering pretty badly from stress and I found meditation (and some other things) to be, to my surprise, extremely effective in counteracting stress。 I told him nearly 20 years ago, I'd recently moved to another part of the country and went along to a group meditation with the local group。 After the meditation, I got into what I thought was an amiable light-hearted philosophical discussion with one of the meditators。 I think I put forward some form of the radical sceptical hypothesis。 My conversation partner leaped up and angrily and loudly denounced me to everyone there as "a nihilist!" Looking back on the incident its seems quite funny now but I was genuinely shocked at the time。 You don't have to buy into the accompanying belief-system to practice the meditation technique, but of course, these meditation groups tend to attract the true-believers。 I did ponder if I am a nihilist but I thought I am more of a natural sceptic, so I bought this to delve a little more deeply into that。The book isn't what I was looking for but nevertheless was very interesting to me。I think its more for academic study of that particular branch of philosophy and would probably be excellent for GCSE, A'Level or even undergraduates。I did dislike a part where that author seems to misrepresent MMGW sceptics and such like although maybe he did it that way for the sake of argument。 Although I also wonder how much academics and people in highly paid white collar jobs have to be seen to tow the line on various topics。 MMGW sceptics are not science deniers, they have an army of scientists who disagree with the so called consensus。 。。。more

Abderrazak Baddou

The only book I read in this series that embraks straight ahead on its topic without going about its history。 And I like that。 If I want to learn about the history of something I wouldn't look for a very short introduction。 I guess people want to read very short introductions of things to understand them now in the present not past。 At least that's what I want。 A fair amount of history when the topic necissates it is understandable。 This is a good introduction to a subtle topic。 The only book I read in this series that embraks straight ahead on its topic without going about its history。 And I like that。 If I want to learn about the history of something I wouldn't look for a very short introduction。 I guess people want to read very short introductions of things to understand them now in the present not past。 At least that's what I want。 A fair amount of history when the topic necissates it is understandable。 This is a good introduction to a subtle topic。 。。。more

Fraser

A treatise on the history and philosophy of skepticism, as it pertains to the philosophy of knowledge。

Grady

This is essentially a thoughtful and precise essay on radical and moderate skepticism; it is, indeed, a very short introduction。 Pritchard repeats himself often, not carelessly, but specifically so the reader can keep hold of his argument。 He explores the paradox presented by radical skepticism, offering several lines of counter-argument, without coming down in favor of any。 Helpfully, Pritchard explains how radical skepticism is not a plausible posture for engagement in public policy, while mod This is essentially a thoughtful and precise essay on radical and moderate skepticism; it is, indeed, a very short introduction。 Pritchard repeats himself often, not carelessly, but specifically so the reader can keep hold of his argument。 He explores the paradox presented by radical skepticism, offering several lines of counter-argument, without coming down in favor of any。 Helpfully, Pritchard explains how radical skepticism is not a plausible posture for engagement in public policy, while moderate skepticism is。 He offers a short discussion of how Aristotelean virtue theory and Pyrrhonian skepticism favor moderation, and suggests how we should think about intellectual humility as a virtue。I was surprised not to see more history of philosophy in this short introduction - I thought it might discuss how skepticism fits into various philosophic systems or projects - but beyond mentioning a handful of touchstones (Wittgenstein, Aristotle), Pritchard is really doing philosophy rather than surveying it。 It’s probably a good introduction in that way also。 。。。more