The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule
- Downloads：9605
- Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
- Create Date：2023-04-05 11:21:30
- Update Date：2025-09-06
- Status：finish
- Author：Angela Saini
- ISBN：1666625361
- Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
- Download
Summary
For fans of Sapiens and The Dawn of Everything， a groundbreaking exploration of gendered oppression--its origins， its histories， our attempts to understand it， and our efforts to combat it
For centuries， societies have treated male domination as natural to the human species。 But how would our understanding of gender inequality--our imagined past and contested present-- look if we didn't assume that men have always ruled over women？ If we saw inequality as something more fragile that has had to be constantly remade and reasserted？
In this bold and radical book， award-winning science journalist Angela Saini explores the roots of what we call patriarchy， uncovering a complex history of how it first became embedded in societies and spread across the globe from prehistory into the present。 She travels to the world's earliest known human settlements， analyzes the latest research findings in science and archaeology， and traces cultural and political histories from the Americas to Asia， finding that:
From around 7，000 years ago there are signs that a small number of powerful men were having more children than other men
From 5，000 years ago， as the earliest states began to expand， gendered codes appeared in parts of Europe， Asia， and the Middle East to serve the interests of powerful elites - but in slow， piecemeal ways， and always resisted
In societies where women left their own families to live with their husbands， marriage customs came to be informed by the widespread practice of captive-taking and slavery， eventually shaping laws that alienated women from systems of support and denied them equal rights
There was enormous variation in gender and power in many societies for thousands of years， but colonialism and empire dramatically changed ways of life across Asia， Africa and the Americas， spreading rigidly patriarchal customs and undermining how people organized their families and work。
In the 19th century and 20th centuries， philosophers， historians， anthropologists， and feminists began to actively question what patriarchy meant as part of the attempt to understand the origins of inequality。 In our own time， despite the pushback against sexism， abuse， and discrimination， even revolutionary efforts to bring about equality have often ended in failure and backlash。
But The Patriarchs is a profoundly hopeful book--one that reveals a multiplicity to human arrangements that undercuts the old grand narratives and exposes male supremacy as no more （and no less） than an ever-shifting element in systems of control。
For centuries， societies have treated male domination as natural to the human species。 But how would our understanding of gender inequality--our imagined past and contested present-- look if we didn't assume that men have always ruled over women？ If we saw inequality as something more fragile that has had to be constantly remade and reasserted？
In this bold and radical book， award-winning science journalist Angela Saini explores the roots of what we call patriarchy， uncovering a complex history of how it first became embedded in societies and spread across the globe from prehistory into the present。 She travels to the world's earliest known human settlements， analyzes the latest research findings in science and archaeology， and traces cultural and political histories from the Americas to Asia， finding that:
From around 7，000 years ago there are signs that a small number of powerful men were having more children than other men
From 5，000 years ago， as the earliest states began to expand， gendered codes appeared in parts of Europe， Asia， and the Middle East to serve the interests of powerful elites - but in slow， piecemeal ways， and always resisted
In societies where women left their own families to live with their husbands， marriage customs came to be informed by the widespread practice of captive-taking and slavery， eventually shaping laws that alienated women from systems of support and denied them equal rights
There was enormous variation in gender and power in many societies for thousands of years， but colonialism and empire dramatically changed ways of life across Asia， Africa and the Americas， spreading rigidly patriarchal customs and undermining how people organized their families and work。
In the 19th century and 20th centuries， philosophers， historians， anthropologists， and feminists began to actively question what patriarchy meant as part of the attempt to understand the origins of inequality。 In our own time， despite the pushback against sexism， abuse， and discrimination， even revolutionary efforts to bring about equality have often ended in failure and backlash。
But The Patriarchs is a profoundly hopeful book--one that reveals a multiplicity to human arrangements that undercuts the old grand narratives and exposes male supremacy as no more （and no less） than an ever-shifting element in systems of control。
Reviews
Harrison Saich
，
The research here is so thorough and really explores the way in which different lenses can reveal completely varying perspectives on situations and events。 It isn’t solely focused on the West either。 I wish more history books were written like this; she’s not just rattling off dates for the sake of it — it’s all super interesting and relevant to the question she’s trying to answer （spoiler: there is no definitive conclusion， but we should all keep trying regardless）。
Avra Gibbs Lamey
，
Recommendation from All in a Day
Ruth Busby
，
This is a non-fiction tour de force of the history of patriarchy， from ancient societies through to the modern day， Saini explores whether patriarchy is the natural state that has always existed， or whether there have been societal variations。What’s fascinating is how patriarchal control has vacillated over time and in different political realities， not least in the 20th century。A really interesting and insightful read。 Thank you to NETGALLEY for the ARC。
Cassandra
，
Very readable synthesis of history， sociology， archaeology， law， and literature exploring the roots and current structure of gender inequality。 So much to chew on here。 I’ll be looking for her other works。
Molecule
，
The topic I have been wondering about for a long time。 Fantastic research and writing by brilliant Angela Saini。 Reading her books is turning the light on blind spots of history and society。 Goes to the top of my recommendation list。
Eva
，
The rest of the book might be fine but I absolutely cannot get over Saini's attempt to present what was happening in the former Eastern bloc under communism as some briefly glorious victory against patriarchy。 To completely gloss over the fact that work was as good as mandatory by law， to present women's lives as some utopian paradise where household chores were taken care of by work canteens and public laundries so they were free to pursue their scientific interests， and to relegate the well-do The rest of the book might be fine but I absolutely cannot get over Saini's attempt to present what was happening in the former Eastern bloc under communism as some briefly glorious victory against patriarchy。 To completely gloss over the fact that work was as good as mandatory by law， to present women's lives as some utopian paradise where household chores were taken care of by work canteens and public laundries so they were free to pursue their scientific interests， and to relegate the well-documented double burden to almost an afterthought is short-sighted and bordering on dangerous。 To present the lack of bananas as the greatest downside of a regime that systematically killed and imprisoned dissident voices is just deeply offensive。 。。。more
Vooh Eheve
，
I don’t think I will ever finish this book。 I am looking for a book that documents and explains the origin and mechanisms of male dominated societies instead I got this rumbling polemic。 Quite distasteful one of that。
Andrea McDowell
，
I enjoyed this and learned some new things， but don't feel the author successfully presented an argument in line with the book's subtitle， nor any cohesive idea of how and why patriarchy got started and persisted on such a scale。 Saini spends a fair bit of space talking about other theories around the origins of patriarchy， and shows quite persuasively how so many of them rest on unacknowledged biological essentialism -- but then never manages to put forward a coherent theory of her own that doe I enjoyed this and learned some new things， but don't feel the author successfully presented an argument in line with the book's subtitle， nor any cohesive idea of how and why patriarchy got started and persisted on such a scale。 Saini spends a fair bit of space talking about other theories around the origins of patriarchy， and shows quite persuasively how so many of them rest on unacknowledged biological essentialism -- but then never manages to put forward a coherent theory of her own that doesn't also rest in some degree on the same。To be clear， I'm no fan of gender essentialism and don't believe patriarchy is in any sense biological。 I don't believe Saini is failing because she is wrong。 I just think she didn't forward the argument the book's cover claimed she would。She did show a lot of how patriarchy ended up developing， in aggregate and in specific places and times， which I found very interesting。 She also covered a few matrilocal societies where women had on average more power than men， which is always a joy to read。 The discussion on how communist states （despite their many human rights' failings） in many （but not all！） ways successfully dismantled （most） male privilege was interesting， but otherwise I found the last few chapters of the book a bit of a drag， with material on feminist history better and more comprehensively covered in other books。Still， on the whole， worth reading。 。。。more
Lisa-Anne Norman
，
The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule by Angela SainiI love a book that packs a punch。 This is a strong and bold book about the complex history of how patriarchy first became embedded in our roots throughout societies across the world。Angela Saini explores right back through to the first known settlements， historical to recent research， science， archaelogy， as well as tracing cultural and political histories sharing with us how far back patriarchy goes。A truly amazing 5-star read for me。 Thanks， The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule by Angela SainiI love a book that packs a punch。 This is a strong and bold book about the complex history of how patriarchy first became embedded in our roots throughout societies across the world。Angela Saini explores right back through to the first known settlements， historical to recent research， science， archaelogy， as well as tracing cultural and political histories sharing with us how far back patriarchy goes。A truly amazing 5-star read for me。 Thanks， @harpercollinsaustralia， for publishing such fine pieces of work。🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 。。。more
Chanelly
，
Some interesting info but too textbooky。
Kate Vane
，
I’ve read a fair amount on the origins and persistence of patriarchy from a political or social science perspective。 The Patriarchs is interesting because it takes a different approach。 It focuses particularly on archaeology， anthropology and genetics to consider where patriarchy might have come from and the variety of forms it takes。 Saini also considers some contemporary and recent societies which offer a different model。At its heart is the question often posed by feminist theorists – is patri I’ve read a fair amount on the origins and persistence of patriarchy from a political or social science perspective。 The Patriarchs is interesting because it takes a different approach。 It focuses particularly on archaeology， anthropology and genetics to consider where patriarchy might have come from and the variety of forms it takes。 Saini also considers some contemporary and recent societies which offer a different model。At its heart is the question often posed by feminist theorists – is patriarchy universal， and if so why？ Some have speculated that there may have been prehistoric societies that were built around goddess-worship or more equal gender roles。 Even if that is the case， why should it be a precondition for change？ Shouldn’t the demand for equality rest on its own merits？One area of the book I found particularly interesting was on the possible beginnings of patriarchy in Europe and Asia。 In the 1960s， British-Dutch archaeologist James Mellaart discovered a spectacular female figurine at Çatalhöyük in modern day Turkey， on an excavation of a 9000-year-old settlement。 This led to a narrative of female goddess worship and a matriarchal culture， although there are other interpretations。 （Saini notes how the prejudices of researchers colour their thinking。 So a body found buried with valuable weapons would be assumed to be male。 If evidence proves it is female， researches would assume she must be the spouse or relative of a great male warrior， rather than a warrior honoured in her own right。）His contemporary， archaeologist and researcher Marija Gimbutas， drew on her work on Neolithic cultures in the Danube Valley。 She argued that there may have been matrilineal societies in Old Europe and parts of Asia which were subsequently overrun by a patrilineal， warrior Kurgan culture from the steppes。 While there was scepticism about some of the more speculative elements of her work during her lifetime， recent scientific analysis at Çatalhöyük suggests men and women had similar diets and did similar work， and DNA evidence does now bear out the subsequent migration of the Kurgan people to the region。While many argue agriculture gave rise to inequality and strongly gendered roles， Saini discusses the accumulating evidence from Mesopotamia that it was the birth of the state。 States require workers to generate wealth for their rulers。 This requires women to be controlled and to reproduce。Saini reminds us that， even within a dominant ideology， there will be differences in the lives of individual women。 People resist， they adapt， they find allies， they make use of whatever power – economic， social or temperamental – they have。 She also considers some counter-examples to patriarchy， such as matrilineal systems in Kerala （abolished in 1975）， and Meghalaya in India， where inheritance is passed down the female line and women have more autonomy in their relationships and child-rearing。 She contrasts the positions of authority held by women in Native American societies in the nineteenth century with their white counterparts fighting for suffrage。Often when I’m reading this kind of book I dip in and out and stop to digest what I’m reading。 But The Patriarchs combines scholarship and insight with a very readable and accessible style。 It’s a fascinating read and I burnt through it in a couple of days。*I received a copy of The Patriarchs from the publisher via NetGalley。 。。。more
Lady Fancifull
，
Patriarchs， matriarchs， colonialists， class politicsAngela Saini’s cool analysis of when and how patriarchy may have originated is a thoughtful and fascinating journey ， busting several sacred cow thinkings along the way， some of which may annoy feminists as well as those who think this is the way things have always been， is ‘natural’ or even heaven help us， evidence of higher and more developed ways than the ‘pre-history’ matrilineal societiesSaini points out that even now， when imperialism and Patriarchs， matriarchs， colonialists， class politicsAngela Saini’s cool analysis of when and how patriarchy may have originated is a thoughtful and fascinating journey ， busting several sacred cow thinkings along the way， some of which may annoy feminists as well as those who think this is the way things have always been， is ‘natural’ or even heaven help us， evidence of higher and more developed ways than the ‘pre-history’ matrilineal societiesSaini points out that even now， when imperialism and colonialism moved in like a juggernaut and attempted to crush other ways of being， pockets of cultures exist where women are more equal。She also takes careful aim at the view that matriarchal societies – and therefore women – were and are more naturally peaceful and gentle。 Such an automatic view in some ways shows evidence of patriarchal thinking， confining women to only nurturing roles。I was also intrigued by the different positions of women during the ‘50s， at the time of the Cold War。 America had returned women to the home， seducing the little woman with consumerism and all mod cons。 By contrast， in Soviet Russia and the satellite states， childcare was part of the State system， like education itself， and， whatever else was wrong with the authoritarian route taken （and a lot was） actually the initial aims sought equality in the workplace and in education and opportunity for women tooMy major takeaway from this fascinating book is that there is not just one kind of patrilineal or patriarchal system， nor was there ever， nor was there one kind of matrilineal or matriarchal system。But certainly those of us who have been born and brought up in patriarchal systems have internalised this， in our view of who we are or should be。She is also most interesting and pertinent about how Western feminism has not always looked at how colonial attitudes have infected us， not to mention class attitudes。 。。。more
Ioanna Karagiorgou
，
I wish I could give four stars， for the extensive research and importance of subject matter， but in parts the book returned to cyclical statements。 The concept of how the state and notios abous nationhood drive and support patriarchal contexts， even though very interested， it did not really go anywhere。 I think the book should have teased out this connection more to make a more clear argument and give an answer， as much as possible， to the question it set to answer。It was also repetitive quite a I wish I could give four stars， for the extensive research and importance of subject matter， but in parts the book returned to cyclical statements。 The concept of how the state and notios abous nationhood drive and support patriarchal contexts， even though very interested， it did not really go anywhere。 I think the book should have teased out this connection more to make a more clear argument and give an answer， as much as possible， to the question it set to answer。It was also repetitive quite a bit and the structure was odd in parts。 。。。more
Megan
，
A fresh take on a stubborn problem that holds us all to account。 Full review to come。
maven
，
Deeply disappointing。 Poorly structured and the author repeatedly fabricated nonsensical strawmen that no one is actually arguing， to then refute them and later build them up again。 The book never really delivered on the overall intended theme， just meandered around and touched upon aspects of patriarchy throughout time， always falling short of the story in each case。 And throughout the book she used the term "gender" to mean many different things， which made the book even more confusing to read Deeply disappointing。 Poorly structured and the author repeatedly fabricated nonsensical strawmen that no one is actually arguing， to then refute them and later build them up again。 The book never really delivered on the overall intended theme， just meandered around and touched upon aspects of patriarchy throughout time， always falling short of the story in each case。 And throughout the book she used the term "gender" to mean many different things， which made the book even more confusing to read。 。。。more
Monika
，
I think I expected a bit more definitive answers and less speculation， but that's not the book's fault。 Overall， I liked it and will read more by the author。 I think I expected a bit more definitive answers and less speculation， but that's not the book's fault。 Overall， I liked it and will read more by the author。 。。。more
Belinda
，
A fascinating book about the origins of patriarchy that argues against conventional wisdom that it is a natural part of human society。 The author covers past and present matrilineal and matrilocal societies， women who have throughout history wielded power and influence in the face of patriarchy， the inconsistencies between patriarchal norms from culture to culture， the effect of scientists examining past societies through a sexist lens， the chafing of women and men against patriarchal laws and t A fascinating book about the origins of patriarchy that argues against conventional wisdom that it is a natural part of human society。 The author covers past and present matrilineal and matrilocal societies， women who have throughout history wielded power and influence in the face of patriarchy， the inconsistencies between patriarchal norms from culture to culture， the effect of scientists examining past societies through a sexist lens， the chafing of women and men against patriarchal laws and the clear self interest of the state in enforcing patriarchal norms to argue that patriarchy is not a natural， inborn aspect of humanity but an imposed social construct。 A great read！ 。。。more
Emma
，
Illuminating， informative， and rage inducing。
Larry
，
Delightfully Disturbing“States institutionalized human categorization and gendered laws; slavery influenced patrilocal marriage; empires exported gendered oppression to nearly every corner of the globe; capitalism exacerbated gender disparities; and religions and traditions are still being manipulated to give psychological force to the notion of male domination。”Struck， disturbed， troubled， etc。 by the observation regarding “human categorization。” My life’s experience only confirms it’s pervasiv Delightfully Disturbing“States institutionalized human categorization and gendered laws; slavery influenced patrilocal marriage; empires exported gendered oppression to nearly every corner of the globe; capitalism exacerbated gender disparities; and religions and traditions are still being manipulated to give psychological force to the notion of male domination。”Struck， disturbed， troubled， etc。 by the observation regarding “human categorization。” My life’s experience only confirms it’s pervasiveness and perversity。I’m likewise profoundly troubled as I recognize institutions （e。g。， country and church） of which I am part （and am grateful for in so many ways） create， contribute to， and perpetuate an environment in which categorizations have been and are oppressive and exploitive。“Christianity” as herein characterized is a generalization。 Individuals may and do vary from the stereotype。 The God I have and continue to come to know and the God I worship， my God， loves each of His children without regard to classifications humankind seems so predisposed even unable not to create and exploit。Nonetheless， I believe that such proclivities which are not divine have found root among societies within those institutions。 I believe in the divine origin of gender。 I believe in the divinity of procreation。 I'd be intentionally irrational and ignorant to disregard the distinction between genders in procreation。However， what is an unavoidable distinction differs mightily from what has become， through errant thought and behavior， intended or otherwise， systemic institutionalized oppression and exploitation of any human。 I believe many in those organizations are blind to the distinction between divine expressions of thought， speech， and being as contrasted with oppressive and exploitative manifestations and expressions in thought， word， and deed。I note the persistent uneven distribution of work at home。 I like to believe I’m less inclined to error。 But am I？ What am I blind to？ Surely I too am conditioned by my environment。P。S。 I believe the author has been careful to acknowledge what is known vs what is not and yet to assert potential meanings and application。 Nicely done。 。。。more
Em
，
Extremely thorough & interesting; touches on concepts that I hadn’t even thought to consider previously and definitely opened my mind。 The reason for the 3 stars is I found myself struggling to pick it up after roughly the half way point。 An incredibly interesting topic and still worth the read- this book will definitely stay with me。
Brandon Forsyth
，
A really impressive book that manages to offer a simple narrative to a very complicated question， and one that makes you imagine better futures。 Saini’s research is sometimes a little too exhaustive， but that’s an unfair criticism for a subject as broad as this。 Lots of interesting things to chew on here， and I appreciated the globetrotting aspect to this most of all。
Jen Burrows
，
The Patriarchs is an interesting anthropological study of gender and male domination。Starting with the origins of the patriachy， Saini then opens the book up to look at what exactly makes a patriarchy in the first place， how they are perpetuated and what alternatives are out there。 Covering over 4，000 years of global history， I found this a fascinating examination of the scientific and historical context behind modern culture。 Saini raises all the right questions， and while they are not always a The Patriarchs is an interesting anthropological study of gender and male domination。Starting with the origins of the patriachy， Saini then opens the book up to look at what exactly makes a patriarchy in the first place， how they are perpetuated and what alternatives are out there。 Covering over 4，000 years of global history， I found this a fascinating examination of the scientific and historical context behind modern culture。 Saini raises all the right questions， and while they are not always answered， it makes for a compelling， thought-provoking read。*Thank you to Netgalley for the arc in exchange for an honest review* 。。。more
David
，
Nothing to see here。There was nothing in the book about the ORIGINS of male domination。 This is especially important because it is what the aim of the book is supposed to be。 The author spends a long time critiquing various theories of a supposed egalitarian early stage。 This is good considering that all of them are based on high levels of speculation。 But if we can't know for sure if there was an egalitarian early stage， then we can't know the ORIGINS of male domination。 The rest of the book fa Nothing to see here。There was nothing in the book about the ORIGINS of male domination。 This is especially important because it is what the aim of the book is supposed to be。 The author spends a long time critiquing various theories of a supposed egalitarian early stage。 This is good considering that all of them are based on high levels of speculation。 But if we can't know for sure if there was an egalitarian early stage， then we can't know the ORIGINS of male domination。 The rest of the book falls into that annoying problem of anthropology; it reads so much into so little。 。。。more
Stan Prager
，
Review of: The Patriarchs: The Origins of Inequality， by Angela Sainiby Stan Prager （2-28-23）t“Down With the Patriarchy” is a both a powerful rallying cry and a fashionable emblem broadcast in memes， coffee mugs， tee shirts—and even， paired with an expletive， sung aloud in a popular Taylor Swift anthem。 But what exactly is the patriarchy？ Is it， as feminists would have it， a reflection of an entrenched system of male domination that defines power relationships between men and women in arenas pub Review of: The Patriarchs: The Origins of Inequality， by Angela Sainiby Stan Prager （2-28-23）t“Down With the Patriarchy” is a both a powerful rallying cry and a fashionable emblem broadcast in memes， coffee mugs， tee shirts—and even， paired with an expletive， sung aloud in a popular Taylor Swift anthem。 But what exactly is the patriarchy？ Is it， as feminists would have it， a reflection of an entrenched system of male domination that defines power relationships between men and women in arenas public and private？ Or， as some on the right might style it， a “woke” whine of victimization that downplays the equality today’s women have achieved at home and at work？ Regardless， is male dominance simply the natural order of things， born out of traditional gender roles in hunting and gathering， reaping and sowing， sword-wielding and childbearing？ Or was it—and does it remain—an artificial institution imposed from above and stubbornly preserved？ Do such patterns run deep into human history， or are they instead the relatively recent by-products of agriculture， of settled civilization， of states and empires？ Did other lifeways once exist？ And finally， perhaps most significantly， does it have to be this way？ tA consideration of these and other related questions， both practical and existential， form the basis for The Patriarchs: The Origins of Inequality， an extraordinary tour de force by Angela Saini marked by both a brilliant gift for analysis and an extremely talented pen。 Saini， a science journalist and author of the groundbreaking， highly acclaimed Superior: The Return of Race Science， one-ups her own prior achievements by widening the lens on entrenched inequalities in human societies to look beyond race as a factor， a somewhat recent phenomenon in the greater scheme of things， to that of gender， which—at least on the face of it—seems far more ancient and deep-seated。 To that end， in The Patriarchs Saini takes the reader on a fascinating expedition to explore male-female relationships—then and now—ranging as far back as the nearly ten-thousand-year-old proto-city Çatalhöyük in present-day Turkey， where some have suggested that female deities were worshipped and matriarchy may have been the status quo， and flashing forward to the still ongoing protests in Iran， sparked by the death in custody of a 22-year-old woman detained for wearing an "improper" hijab。 There are many stops in between， including the city-states of Classical Greece， which saw women controlled and even confined by their husbands in democratic Athens， but yet celebrated for their strength and independence （of a sorts） in the rigidly structured autocracy that defined the Spartan polis。 But most of the journey is contemporary and global in scope， from Seneca Falls， New York， where many Onondaga Native American women continue to enjoy a kind of gender equality that white American women could hardly imagine when they launched their bid for women’s rights in that locale in 1848， to the modern-day states of Kerala and Meghalaya in India， which still retain deeply-rooted traditions of the matrilinear and the matriarchal， respectively， in a nation where arranged marriages remain surprisingly common。 And to Afghanistan， where the recently reinstalled Taliban regime prohibits the education of girls and mandates the wearing of a Burqa in public， and Ethiopia， where in many parts of the country female genital mutilation is the rule， not the exception。 There are even interviews with European women who grew up in the formerly socialist eastern bloc， some who look back wistfully to a time marked by better economic security and far greater opportunities for women， despite the repression that otherwise characterized the state。 I’m a big fan of Saini’s previous work， but still I still cracked the cover of her latest book with some degree of trepidation。 This is， after all， such a loaded topic that it could， if mishandled， too easily turn to polemic。 So I carefully sniffed around for manifesto-disguised-as-thesis， for axes cleverly cloaked from grinding， for cherry-picked data， and for broad brushes。 （Metaphors gleefully mixed！） Thankfully， there was none of that。 Instead， she approaches this effort throughout as a scientist， digging deep， asking questions， and reporting answers that sometimes are not to her liking。 You have to respect that。 My background is history， a study that emphasizes complexity and nuance， and mandates both careful research and an analytical evaluation of relevant data。 Both science and history demand critical thinking skills。 In The Patriarchs， Saini demonstrates that she walks with great competence in each of these disciplines。A case in point is her discussion of Çatalhöyük， an astonishing neolithic site first excavated by English archaeologist James Mellaart in the late 1950s that revealed notable hallmarks of settled civilization uncommon for its era。 Based on what he identified as figurines of female deities， such as the famous Seated Woman of Çatalhöyük that dates back to 6000 BCE， Mellaart claimed that a “Mother Goddess” culture prevailed。 The notion that goddesses once dominated a distant past was dramatically boosted by Lithuanian archaeologist and anthropologist Marija Gimbutas， who wrote widely on this topic， and argued as well that a peaceful， matriarchal society was characteristic to the neolithic settlements of Old Europe prior to being overrun by Indo-European marauders from the north who imposed a warlike patriarchy upon the subjugated population。I squirmed a bit in my seat as I read this， knowing that the respective conclusions of both Mellaart and Gimbutas have since been， based upon more rigorous studies， largely discredited as wildly overdrawn。 But there was no need for such concerns， for in subsequent pages Saini herself points to current experts and the scholarly consensus to rebut at least some of the bolder assertions of these earlier archaeologists。 It turns out that in both Çatalhöyük and Old Europe， while society was probably not hierarchal， it was likely more gender-neutral than matriarchal。 It is clear that the author should be commended for her exhaustive research。 While reading of Indo-European invaders—something Gimbutas got right—my thoughts instantly went to David Anthony’s magnificent study， The Horse， the Wheel， and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World， which I read some years back。 When I thumbed ahead to the “Notes，” I was delighted to find a citation for the Anthony book！ It is soon clear that in her search for the origins of inequality， Saini’s goal is to ask more questions than insist upon answers。 Also increasingly evident is that even if it seems to have become more common in the past centuries， patriarchy is not the norm。 No， it doesn’t have to be this way。 Perhaps matriarchy did not characterize Çatalhöyük—and we really can’t be certain—but there is evidence for matriarchal societies elsewhere; some still flourish to this day。 History and events in the current millennium demonstrate that there are choices， and societies can—and we can—choose equality rather than a condition where one group is dominated by another based upon race， caste， or gender。 With all of the author’s questions and her search for answers， however， it is the journey that is most enjoyable。 In such an expansive work of science， history， and philosophy， the narrative never bogs down。 And while the scope is vast， it is only a couple of hundred pages。 I actually found myself wanting more。 If there is one area where I would caution Saini， it was in her treatment of ancient Greece。 Yes， based upon the literature， Athenian women seem to have been stifled and Spartan women less inhibited， but of the hundreds of poleis that existed in the Classical period， we really only have relevant information for a few， surviving data is weighted heavily towards the elites of Athens and Sparta， and much of it is tarnished by editorializing on both sides that reflected the antipathy between these two bitter rivals。 There is more to the story。 Aspasia， the mistress of the Athenian statesman Pericles， was a powerful figure in her own right。 Lysistrata， the splendid political satire created by the Athenian Aristophanes， smacks of a kind of ancient feminism as it has women on both sides of the Peloponnesian War denying sex to their men until a truce is called。 This play could never have resonated if the female characters were wholly imagined。 And while we can perhaps admire the status of a Spartan woman when juxtaposed with her Athenian counterpart， we must remember that their primary role in that rigid， militaristic society was to bear the sons of warriors。 tBut the station of a Spartan woman raises an interesting counterintuitive that I had hoped Saini would explore。 Why was it—and does it remain the case—that women seem to gain greater freedom in autocratic states than democratic ones？ It is certainly anachronistic to style fifth century Sparta as totalitarian， but the structure of the state seems to have far more in common with the twentieth century Soviet Union and the Peoples Republic of China， where despite repression women achieved far greater equality than they did in Athens or， at least until very recently， in Europe and the United States。 And I really wanted a chapter on China， where the crippling horror of foot-binding for girls was not abolished until 1912， and still lingered in places until the communist takeover mid-century。 Mao was responsible for the wanton slaughter of millions， yet women attained a greater equality under his brutal regime than they had for the thousands of years that preceded him。 tWhile she touches upon it， I also looked for a wider discussion of how conservative women can sometimes come to not only represent the greatest obstacle for women’s rights but to advance rather than impede the patriarchy。 As an American， there are many painful reminders of that here， where in decades past the antifeminist Phyllis Schlafly nearly single-handedly derailed passage of the Equal Rights Amendment。 Most recently， it was a coalition of Republican and Christian evangelical women who led the crusade that eventually succeeded in curbing abortion rights。 But then， as I wished for another hundred pages to go over all this， Saini summed up the incongruity succinctly in a discussion of female genital mutilation in Africa， citing the resistance to change by an Ethiopian girl who asserted: “If our mothers should refuse to continue cutting us， we will cut ourselves。” [p191] tIn the end， Saini’s strategy was sound。 The Patriarchs boasts a manageable size and the kind of readability that might be sacrificed in a bulkier treatise。 The author doesn’t try to say it all: only what is most significant。 Also， both the length and the presentation lend appeal to a popular audience， while the research and extensive notes will suit an academic one， as well。 That is an especially rare accomplishment these days！ Whatever preconceived notions the reader might have， based upon the title and its implications， Saini demonstrates again and again that it’s not her intention to prove a point， but rather to make you think。 Here she succeeds wonderfully。 And you get the impression that it is her intellectual curiosity that guides her life。 Born in London of ethnic Indian parents and now residing in New York City， she is a highly educated woman with brown skin， feet that can step comfortably into milieus west and east， and an insightful mind that fully embraces the possibilities of the modern world。 Thus， Saini is in so many ways ideally suited to address issues of racism and sexism。 She is still quite young， and this is her fourth book。 I suspect there will be many more。 In the meantime， read this one。 It will be well worth your time。Note: This review was based upon an Uncorrected Page Proof editionNote: I reviewed Saini’s previous book Superior here: Review of: Superior: The Return of Race Science， by Angela SainiReview of: The Patriarchs: The Origins of Inequality， by Angela Saini – Regarp Book Blog https://regarp。com/2023/02/28/review-。。。 。。。more
The Rationalist
，
An absolutely excellent book。 It deals with one of THE big questions - given that it's not a "natural" thing in human nature for men to systematically oppress women， how and when and WHY did it actually start？ But what I loved about it most is that it's packed full of real stories， beautifully written- you feel like you meet people from ancient Turkey to modern Iran， and there is lots on US history that completely floored me and isn't widely known。 All of that makes it hugely readable。 If everyo An absolutely excellent book。 It deals with one of THE big questions - given that it's not a "natural" thing in human nature for men to systematically oppress women， how and when and WHY did it actually start？ But what I loved about it most is that it's packed full of real stories， beautifully written- you feel like you meet people from ancient Turkey to modern Iran， and there is lots on US history that completely floored me and isn't widely known。 All of that makes it hugely readable。 If everyone read this， we could finally stop having ignorant conversations about men and women's roles， and start having productive ones！ 。。。more
Monica
，
Saini seems to have pieced together insights which shine a torch on the given structure of society。 We regard patriarchy as foundational without giving it a second thought but this book presents ideas which completely subvert this。 It has changed the way that I view the role of women， and in turn， all minored groups， historically and in the present。 An absolute must-read。
Emma Hardy
，
I knew the subject matter would interest me， but the book was far too similar to a textbook and an educational piece rather than an informal non fiction read。 Too heavy for me。
The Asian Word
，
I have been an avid reader of Angela Saini’s books since her debut with Geek Nation。 I’ve always been impressed by the way she chooses a topical subject， fully researches it and produces a completely necessary book about a subject you didn’t know you would be drawn into so thoroughly。 That’s exactly what she did with The Patriarchs。I very much enjoyed reading The Patriarchs and would recommend it to anyone wanting to better understand global societies and how they’ve come to be what they are in I have been an avid reader of Angela Saini’s books since her debut with Geek Nation。 I’ve always been impressed by the way she chooses a topical subject， fully researches it and produces a completely necessary book about a subject you didn’t know you would be drawn into so thoroughly。 That’s exactly what she did with The Patriarchs。I very much enjoyed reading The Patriarchs and would recommend it to anyone wanting to better understand global societies and how they’ve come to be what they are in terms of gender relations and rule。 Saini has researched both patriarchal （and matriarchal） societies and brilliantly distilled the information into a fascinating and informative non fiction story。 I found it especially interesting to read about societies that had started as matriarchal or equal， but became patriarchal over time。Paraphrasing Sathnam Sanghera’s cover quote， I learned something new， interesting and valuable on every page。 It is essential reading for those interested in gender rule， feminism， understanding global cultural differences and the development of societies and their futures。 。。。more
Annarella
，
It's a good non fiction book that talks about an interesting topic。 There's a lot of facts， figures and myth debunking。I found it interesting but also a bit boring and text-book like at times。I learned something new， didn't always agree with the author and appreciated this work。Many thanks to the publisher for this arc， all opinions are mine It's a good non fiction book that talks about an interesting topic。 There's a lot of facts， figures and myth debunking。I found it interesting but also a bit boring and text-book like at times。I learned something new， didn't always agree with the author and appreciated this work。Many thanks to the publisher for this arc， all opinions are mine 。。。more
Simone
，
Thanks to NetGalley and The Publisher for this eARC in exchange for an honest review。3。5 stars rounded up。This has been a hard review to write。 While overall I found the book interesting and informative， at times i found it frustrating and a chore to get though。 I didn't connect well with the writing style which was somewhat academic and I just didn't find it that readable for a general audience。 However， the topic was fascinating and kept pulling me back in。 However， when I finished the book I Thanks to NetGalley and The Publisher for this eARC in exchange for an honest review。3。5 stars rounded up。This has been a hard review to write。 While overall I found the book interesting and informative， at times i found it frustrating and a chore to get though。 I didn't connect well with the writing style which was somewhat academic and I just didn't find it that readable for a general audience。 However， the topic was fascinating and kept pulling me back in。 However， when I finished the book I came away feeling some what dissatisfied and misled as in my opinion I don't think the question proposed was addressed or answered at all。 However， I did learn a lot about many different Matriarchal societies past and present， and the many ways they differ from Patriarchal ones and for that I don't regret the time I spent reading this book。 。。。more
tpg0
，
As an AI language model， I do not have personal opinions or preferences。 However， I can provide information about the book 'The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule' by David I。 Kertzer。 The book explores the history and evolution of patriarchy， tracing the roots of male dominance in ancient societies and demonstrating how it continues to shape modern gender relationships。 Kertzer argues that patriarchy was not a given for human societies and that its emergence was a complex political and cultural process。 The book examines how early societies were organized around different forms of authority and power structures， including matriarchy， before the emergence of patriarchal societies。 It also highlights the ways in which patriarchy has been used to justify and entrench gender inequalities throughout history。 Overall， 'The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule' provides a thought-provoking and insightful exploration of the historical and cultural origins of patriarchy and the ways in which it has shaped gender relations in different societies。
tpg1
，
As an AI language model， I do not have personal opinions or beliefs。 However， I can provide an overview of the book 'The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule' by David I。 Kertzer。 In this book， Kertzer argues that the historical dominance of men in social， political， and economic realms is not a natural or inherent phenomenon， but rather a cultural construct shaped by the religious and societal beliefs of the past。 The book explores the role of religion， family structures， and power dynamics in creating this patriarchal system and traces its evolution from ancient societies to contemporary times。 Kertzer's work challenges the commonly held notion that men's dominance is biologically determined or rationalized by nature。 Instead， he demonstrates how patriarchal ideologies were historically enforced， legitimized， and institutionalized， leading to pervasive gender inequalities that persist to this day。 Overall， Kertzer's book offers a critical examination of the cultural roots and historical trajectory of patriarchy， shedding light on the systemic gender bias that affects societies worldwide。
tpg2
，